Cited by 165IoT and Edge/Fog ComputingCloud Computing and Remote Desktop TechnologiesCaching and Content Delivery

Cloudlets: at the Leading Edge of Mobile-Cloud Convergence

Open access
Satyanarayanan, Mahadev, Chen, Zhuo, Ha, Kiryong, Hu, Wenlu, Richter, Wolfgang, Pillai, Padmanabhan·2014·Proceedings of the 6th International Conference on Mobile Computing, Applications and Services

Abstract

As mobile computing and cloud computing converge, the sensing and interaction capabilities of mobile devices can be seamlessly fused with compute-intensive and data-intensive processing in the cloud. Cloudlets are important architectural components in this convergence, representing the middle tier

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.4108/icst.mobicase.2014.257757

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • This has evolved the cloudlet concept into providing one link in a 3-tier hierarchy: mobile device/cloudlet/cloud.

    “This in turn has evolved the cloudlet concept into providing one link in a 3-tier hierarchy: mobile device/cloudlet/cloud [94].”

    From Edge AI: A survey (2023) · cites this paper as [94]

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 15

  1. T. Agus, C. Suied, S. Thorpe, and D. Pressnitzer. Characteristics of human voice processing. In Proceedings of 2010 IEEE International Symposium on Circuits and Systems (ISCAS), Paris, France, June 2010.
  2. A. L. Berger, V. J. D. Pietra, and S. A. D. Pietra. A maximum entropy approach to natural language processing. Comput. Linguist., 22(1):39- 71, Mar. 1996.
  3. G. Buchsbaum. A spatial processor model for object colour perception. Journal of the Franklin Institute, 310(1):1-26, July 1980.
  4. S. R. Ellis, K. Mania, B. D. Adelstein, and M. I. Hill. Generalizeability of Latency Detection in a Variety of Virtual Environments. In Proceed- ings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society Annual Meeting, volume 48, 2004.
  5. D. Garlan, D. Siewiorek, A. Smailagic, and P. Steenkiste. Project Aura: Towards Distraction-Free Pervasive Computing. IEEE Pervasive Computing, 1(2), April 2002.
  6. K. Ha, Z. Chen, W. Hu, W. Richter, P. Pillai, and M. Satyanarayanan. Towards Wearable Cognitive Assistance. In Proceedings of MobSys 2014, Bretton Woods, NH, June 2014.
  7. K. Koedinger and A. Corbett. Cognitive Tutors: Technology bringing learning science to the classroom. In K. Sawyer, editor, The Cam- bridge Handbook of the Learning Sciences, pages 61-78. Cambridge University Press, 2006.
  8. A. Li, X. Yang, S. Kandula, and M. Zhang. CloudCmp: comparing public cloud providers. In Proceedings of the 10th annual conference on Internet measurement, 2010.
  9. D. McGrath and A. Banathy. What Can A Micro Data Cen- ter Do For You? The Journal from Rockwell Automation and Our PartnerNetwork, October 2012. www.rockwellautomation.com/ rockwellautomation/news/the-journal/.
  10. M. Ramon, S. Caharel, and B. Rossion. The speed of recognition of personally familiar faces. Perception, 40(4):437-449, 2011.
  11. M. Satyanarayanan. Fundamental Challenges in Mobile Computing. In Proceedings of the ACM Symposium on Principles of Distributed Computing, Ottawa, Canada, 1996.
  12. M. Satyanarayanan. Augmenting Cognition. IEEE Pervasive Comput- ing, 3(2):4-5, April-June 2004.
  13. H. A. Simon. Designing Organizations for an Information-Rich World. In Martin Greenberger, editor, Computers, Communication, and the Public Interest. The Johns Hopkins Press, Baltimore, MD, 1971.
  14. D. Weinland, R. Ronfard, and E. Boyer. A survey of vision-based meth- ods for action representation, segmentation and recognition. Computer Vision and Image Understanding, 115(2):224-241, 2011.
  15. W. Zhao, R. Chellappa, P. J. Phillips, and A. Rosenfeld. Face Recognition: A Literature Survey. ACM Computing Surveys, 35(4):399- 458, December 2003.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Satyanarayanan, M., Chen, Z., Ha, K., Hu, W., Richter, W., & Pillai, P.
Affiliations
  • Carnegie Mellon University (US)
  • Intel (United States) (US)
Corresponding author
Satyanarayanan, Mahadev
Venue
Proceedings of the 6th International Conference on Mobile Computing, Applications and Services
Publisher
ICST
Published
2014
OpenAlex
W2546457897
Cited by
165
References
2
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 8 · 2022: 9 · 2021: 16 · 2020: 14 · 2019: 29 · 2018: 32 · 2017: 22 · 2016: 18 · 2015: 10 · 2013: 1
FWCI
12.98
Type
conference paper
Language
en
Open access
Locations
Mobile Computing, Applications, and Services (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • National Science Foundation (1065336, FA8650-11-C-7190)
  • U.S. Department of Defense (FA8721-05-C-0003, Contract No. FA8721-05-C-0003)
  • Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency (FA8650-11-C-7190)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Networks and Communications › IoT and Edge/Fog Computing
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Hardware and Architecture › Cloud Computing and Remote Desktop Technologies
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Networks and Communications › Caching and Content Delivery
Keywords
cloudlets, mobile computing, cloud computing, edge computing, mobile devices

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review