The SAGE Dictionary of Social Research Methods
Abstract
Bringing together the work of over eighty leading academics and researchers worldwide to produce the definitive reference and research tool for the social sciences, The SAGE Dictionary of Social Research Methods contains more than 230 entries providing the widest coverage of the all the main terms in the research process. It encompasses philosophies of science, research paradigms and designs, specific aspects of data collection, practical issues to be addressed when carrying out research, and the role of research in terms of function and context. Each entry includes: - A concise definition of the concept - A description of distinctive features: historical and disciplinary backgrounds; key writers; applications - A critical and reflective evaluation of the concept under consideration - Cross references to associated concepts within the dictionary - A list of key readings Written in a lively style, The SAGE Dictionary of Social Research Methods is an essential study guide for students and first-time researchers. It is a primary source of reference for advanced study, a necessary supplement to established textbooks, and a state-of-the-art reference guide to the specialized language of research across the social sciences.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The four schools were chosen as a convenience sample because they were known to be carrying out learning rounds at the time, and as a purposive sample because they represented four different Local Authorities and were more likely to present a wider picture of practice than a single Local Authority.
“Each school was in a different local authority and they were chosen both because they were a convenience sample (Walliman and Buckler 2008) and a purposive sample (Jupp 2006). A convenience sample because they were known to be carrying out learning rounds at the time that were able to gather the data and a purposive sample because they represented four different Local Authorities and were, there”
From Teacher agency and professional learning communities; what can Learning Rounds in Scotland teach us? (2017) · cites this paper as Jupp 2006
Cited by
Sorted by citations
The food waste hierarchy as a framework for the management of food surplus and food waste
Papargyropoulou, E., Lozano, R., K. Steinberger, J., Wright, N., & Ujang, Z. B. (2014) · Journal of Cleaner Production · doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2014.04.020 · Cited by 1,711 · see citing works
Lozano, R., Merrill, M., Sammalisto, K., Ceulemans, K., & Lozano, F. (2017) · Sustainability · doi:10.3390/su9101889 · Cited by 904 · see citing works
An Age-Old Problem: Examining the Discourses of Ageing in HCI and Strategies for Future Research
Vines, J., Pritchard, G., Wright, P., Olivier, P., & Brittain, K. (2015) · ACM Transactions on Computer-Human Interaction · doi:10.1145/2696867 · Cited by 461 · see citing works
Barrot, J. S. (2023) · Computer Assisted Language Learning · doi:10.1080/09588221.2021.1936071 · Cited by 248 · see citing works
Teacher agency and professional learning communities; what can Learning Rounds in Scotland teach us?
Philpott, C., & Oates, C. (2017) · Professional Development in Education · doi:10.1080/19415257.2016.1180316 · Cited by 84 · see citing works
Asogwa, I. E. (2023) · Journal of Cleaner Production · doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2022.135842 · Cited by 12 · see citing works
Hierarchical Order of User Preference Parameters in Adopting M-government Services
Faculty of Technology Management and Business, U. T. H. O. M., Rashed Mohammed Alneyadi, R. H., Abdul Hamid, N. A., & Faculty of Technology Management and Business, U. T. H. O. M. (2021) · International Journal of Sustainable Construction Engineering and Technology · doi:10.30880/ijscet.2021.12.05.022 · Cited by 2
- Authors
- Jupp, V.
- Corresponding author
- Jupp, Victor
- Venue
- SAGE Publications Ltd eBooks
- Publisher
- SAGE Publications, Ltd
- Published
- 2006
- OpenAlex
- W615140566
- Cited by
- 1,232
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 20 · 2025: 30 · 2024: 51 · 2023: 81 · 2022: 79 · 2021: 89 · 2020: 81 · 2019: 89 · 2018: 77 · 2017: 91 · 2016: 90 · 2015: 99 · 2014: 108 · 2013: 73 · 2012: 63
- Type
- reference entry
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- SAGE Publications Ltd eBooks (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › General Social Sciences › Social Science and Policy Research
- Social Sciences › Education › Diverse Academic Research Areas
- Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Management Science and Operations Research › Business Strategies and Management Research
- Keywords
- social science methodology, research paradigms, research design, data collection, research process, role of research, scientific terminology
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review