A Survival Kit for Doctoral Students and Their Supervisors: Traveling the Landscape of Research
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Postgraduate students have a dual identity: their work must be subject to assessment and degree standards, but as researchers they can be treated as academics and even equals.
“On the one hand, their work must be subject to assessment and degree standards, but as researchers, they can be treated as academics and even equals (Tanggaard & Wegener, 2017).”
From A university framework for the responsible use of generative AI in research (2026) · cites this paper as Tanggaard & Wegener, 2017
Cited by
Sorted by citations
A university framework for the responsible use of generative AI in research
Smith, S. M., Tate, M., Freeman, K., Walsh, A., Ballsun-Stanton, B., & Lane, M. (2026) · Journal of Higher Education Policy and Management · doi:10.1080/1360080x.2025.2509187 · Cited by 46 · see citing works
- Authors
- Tanggaard, L., & Wegener, C.
- Venue
- Sage eBooks
- Publisher
- SAGE Publications, Inc.
- Published
- 2017
- OpenAlex
- W1790935494
- Cited by
- 8
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 1 · 2025: 1 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 1 · 2018: 1 · 2017: 2 · 2016: 1
- FWCI
- 0.89
- Type
- book
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Sage eBooks (publishedVersion)
- VBN Forskningsportal (Aalborg Universitet) (submittedVersion)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Doctoral Education Challenges and Solutions
- Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Information Systems and Management › Research, Science, and Academia
- Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › History and Philosophy of Science › Academic Writing and Publishing
- Keywords
- doctoral students, doctoral supervision, research supervision, doctoral education, graduate research
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
