The DOI matches its Crossref record.
The Content Analysis Guidebook
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“This mixed analytical approach allows the study to capture both the structural characteristics and interpretive dimensions of digital heritage platforms, thereby offering a more comprehensive understanding of how Ottoman cultural heritage is reconstructed in new media environments”
From Reconstructing Ottoman Heritage through New Media: Digitalization, Virtual Museums, and Cultural Memory (2026) · cites this paper as Neuendorf, 2017
In the citing paper
“Using a standard intercoder reliability assessment on this sample is a common practice in content analysis to validate the scheme [88].”
From Virtual Museums as Meaning-Modeling Systems in Digital Heritage (2025) · cites this paper as [88]
Citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Sovacool, B. K. (2014) · Energy Research & Social Science · doi:10.1016/j.erss.2014.02.003 · Cited by 1,385
ChatGPT in higher education: considerations for academic integrity and student learning
(2023) · Journal of Applied Learning & Teaching · doi:10.37074/jalt.2023.6.1.17 · Cited by 853
Maditati, D. R., Munim, Z. H., Schramm, H., & Kummer, S. (2018) · Resources Conservation and Recycling · doi:10.1016/j.resconrec.2018.08.004 · Cited by 327
Taming Textual Data: The Contribution of Corpus Linguistics to Computer-Aided Text Analysis
Pollach, I. (2011) · Organizational Research Methods · doi:10.1177/1094428111417451 · Cited by 182
Hienerth, C., & Lettl, C. U. (2011) · Journal of Product Innovation Management · doi:10.1111/j.1540-5885.2011.00869.x · Cited by 144
Metadata
- Authors
- Neuendorf, K. A.
- Corresponding author
- Neuendorf, Kimberly A.
- Venue
- Sage eBooks
- Publisher
- SAGE Publications, Inc
- Published
- 2017
- OpenAlex
- W4411746978
- Cited by
- 480
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 205 · 2025: 195 · 2024: 6 · 2023: 6 · 2022: 8 · 2021: 7 · 2020: 11 · 2019: 5 · 2018: 7 · 2017: 6
- FWCI
- 4.27
- Type
- book
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Sage eBooks (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › General Social Sciences › Computational and Text Analysis Methods
- Social Sciences › Education › Qualitative Research Methods and Applications
- Social Sciences › Education › Educational Research and Analysis
- Keywords
- content analysis, qualitative research, text analysis, research design
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
