Cited by 1,000Disability Rights and RepresentationInclusion and Disability in Education and SportDisability Education and Employment

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Handbook of Disability Studies

Abstract

This path-breaking handbook signals the emergence of a vital new area of scholarship, social policy and activism. It aims to be a thought-provoking, interdisciplinary, international examination of this field

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.4135/9781412976251

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Items 801–900 of 983

Metadata

Authors
Albrecht, G., Seelman, K., & Bury, M.
Venue
Sage eBooks
Published
2001
OpenAlex
W656488120
Cited by
1,000
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 8 · 2025: 35 · 2024: 51 · 2023: 15 · 2022: 37 · 2021: 24 · 2020: 42 · 2019: 35 · 2018: 39 · 2017: 68 · 2016: 36 · 2015: 43 · 2014: 62 · 2013: 62 · 2012: 59
FWCI
39.84
Type
book
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Sage eBooks (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Disability Rights and Representation
  • Social Sciences › Education › Inclusion and Disability in Education and Sport
  • Social Sciences › Education › Disability Education and Employment
Keywords
disability studies, disability, social policy, activism, disability rights

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review