The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Emotions and Fieldwork
Abstract
Introduction Fieldworkers as Professionals Immersion vs Analytic Ideals Feelings about Participants Conclusions
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
“Outing” the Researcher: The Provenance, Process, and Practice of Reflexivity
Finlay, L. (2002) · Qualitative Health Research · doi:10.1177/104973202129120052 · Cited by 1,937
Corbin, J., & Morse, J. M. (2003) · Qualitative Inquiry · doi:10.1177/1077800403009003001 · Cited by 900
Using Reflexivity to Optimize Teamwork in Qualitative Research
Barry, C. A., Britten, N., Barber, N., Bradley, C., & Stevenson, F. (1999) · Qualitative Health Research · doi:10.1177/104973299129121677 · Cited by 773
Researching sensitive topics: qualitative research as emotion work
Dickson-Swift, V., James, E. L., Kippen, S., & Liamputtong, P. (2009) · Qualitative Research · doi:10.1177/1468794108098031 · Cited by 554
Theory and methodology in researching emotions in education
Zembylas, M. (2007) · International Journal of Research & Method in Education · doi:10.1080/17437270701207785 · Cited by 294
Metadata
- Authors
- Kleinman, S., & Copp, M.
- Venue
- Sage eBooks
- Publisher
- SAGE Publications, Inc.
- Published
- 1993
- OpenAlex
- W612732528
- Cited by
- 567
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 14.50
- Type
- book
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Emotions and Fieldwork. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.4135/9781412984041
- The paper
- Kleinman, S., & Copp, M. (1993). Emotions and Fieldwork. Sage eBooks. https://doi.org/10.4135/9781412984041
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
