Cited by 230Decision-Making and Behavioral EconomicsComplex Systems and Decision MakingMulti-Criteria Decision Making

Ethnographic Decision Tree Modeling

Gladwin, Christina H.·1989·Sage eBooks

Abstract

Why Model How People Make Decisions How to Model Simple `Do It Don't Do It' Decisions How to Test Decision Models How Not to Do It Common Problems How to Build Multi-Stage Models What's the Payoff

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.4135/9781412984102

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The interview protocols for the initial and reflection interviews were structured using an ethnographic decision tree modeling approach.

    “The interview protocols for the initial interview and reflection interview were structured using an ethnographic decision tree modeling approach (Gladwin, 1989).”

    From Promising directions for human-robot interactions defined by older adults (2024) · cites this paper as Gladwin, 1989

Cites

Still being checked.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Gladwin, C. H.
Corresponding author
Gladwin, Christina H.
Venue
Sage eBooks
Published
1989
OpenAlex
W200776159
Cited by
230
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 6 · 2023: 6 · 2022: 10 · 2021: 11 · 2020: 3 · 2019: 3 · 2018: 13 · 2017: 8 · 2016: 7 · 2015: 9 · 2014: 8 · 2013: 8 · 2012: 14
FWCI
1.91
Type
book
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Sage eBooks (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › General Decision Sciences › Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics
  • Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Management Science and Operations Research › Complex Systems and Decision Making
  • Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Management Science and Operations Research › Multi-Criteria Decision Making
Keywords
decision tree modeling, ethnography, human decision-making, model testing

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review