Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 293

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 52 of the 52 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Principal Components Analysis With Nonlinear Optimal Scaling Transformations for Ordinal and Nominal Data

Meulman, Jacqueline, van Der Kooij, Anita, Heiser, Willem·2004·The SAGE Handbook of Quantitative Methodology for the Social Sciences

Abstract

This chapter focuses on the analysis of ordinal and nominal multivariate data, using a special variety of principal components analysis that includes nonlinear optimal scaling transformation of the variables. Since the early 1930s, classical statistical methods have been adapted in various ways to suit the particular characteristics of social and behavioral science research. Research in these areas often results in data that are nonnumerical, with measurements recorded on scales having an uncertain unit of measurement. Data would typically consist of qualitative or categorical variables that describe the persons in a limited number of categories. The zero point of these scales is uncertain, the relationships among the different categories is often unknown, and although frequently it can be assumed that the categories are ordered, their mutual distances might still be unknown. The uncertainty in the unit of measurement is not just a matter of measurement error because its variability may have a systematic component. For example, in the data set that will be used throughout this chapter as an illustration, concerning feelings of national identity and involving 25,000 respondents in 23 different countries all over the world (International Social Survey Programme [ISSP], 1995), there are variables indicating how close the respondents feel toward their neighborhood, town, and country, measured on a 5-point scale with labels ranging from not close at all to very close. This response format is typical for a lot of behavioral research and definitely is not numerical (even though the categories are ordered and can be coded numerically).

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.4135/9781412986311.n3

Cites

52 of 52 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 52 references

Cited by

See all 293

Metadata

Authors
Meulman, J., van Der Kooij, A., & Heiser, W.
Venue
The SAGE Handbook of Quantitative Methodology for the Social Sciences
Published
2004
Pages
50-71
OpenAlex
W2502158375
Cited by
293
References
52
FWCI
23.65
Type
book chapter
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Principal Components Analysis With Nonlinear Optimal Scaling Transformations for Ordinal and Nominal Data. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.4135/9781412986311.n3
The paper
Meulman, J., van Der Kooij, A., & Heiser, W. (2004). Principal Components Analysis With Nonlinear Optimal Scaling Transformations for Ordinal and Nominal Data. The SAGE Handbook of Quantitative Methodology for the Social Sciences. https://doi.org/10.4135/9781412986311.n3

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.