Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 7,317

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Multidimensional Scaling by Optimizing Goodness of Fit to a Nonmetric Hypothesis

Kruskal, J. B.·1964·Psychometrika

Abstract

Multidimensional scaling is the problem of representing n objects geometrically by n points, so that the interpoint distances correspond in some sense to experimental dissimilarities between objects. In just what sense distances and dissimilarities should correspond has been left rather vague in most approaches, thus leaving these approaches logically incomplete. Our fundamental hypothesis is that dissimilarities and distances are monotonically related. We define a quantitative, intuitively satisfying measure of goodness of fit to this hypothesis. Our technique of multidimensional scaling is to compute that configuration of points which optimizes the goodness of fit. A practical computer program for doing the calculations is described in a companion paper.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/bf02289565

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 1 references

Research works printed but not linked: 16

  1. Aumann, 1959, Assigning quantitative values to qualitative factors in the Naval electronics problem, Naval Res. Logistics Quart., 6, 1
  2. Hardy, 1952, Inequalities
  3. 10.1007/BF02289630 · DOI
  4. 10.2466/pr0.1958.4.h.511 · DOI
  5. Kolmogorov, 1957, Elements of the theory of functions and functional analysis. Vol. 1.Metric and normed spaces
  6. 10.1037/h0044796 · DOI
  7. 10.1007/BF02289726 · DOI
  8. Torgerson, 1958, Theory and methods of scaling
  9. Abelson, 1959, Efficient conversion of nonmetric information into metric information, Proc. Amer. statist. Ass. Meetings, Social statist. Section, 226
  10. 10.1002/nav.3800050204 · DOI
  11. 10.1037/h0041867 · DOI
  12. 10.1177/001872086300500104 · DOI
  13. 10.1007/BF02289694 · DOI · Paper page
  14. 10.1093/biomet/46.1-2.36 · DOI · Paper page
  15. 10.1080/00223980.1954.9712953 · DOI
  16. 10.1037/h0049149 · DOI

Cited by

See all 7,317

Metadata

Authors
Kruskal, J. B.
Venue
Psychometrika
Published
1964-03
Volume
29
Issue
1
Pages
1-27
ISSN
  • 0033-3123 (ISSN-L)
  • 1860-0980
OpenAlex
W2152825437
Cited by
7,317
References
1
FWCI
36.50
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Multidimensional Scaling by Optimizing Goodness of Fit to a Nonmetric Hypothesis. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1007/bf02289565
The paper
Kruskal, J. B. (1964). Multidimensional Scaling by Optimizing Goodness of Fit to a Nonmetric Hypothesis. Psychometrika. https://doi.org/10.1007/bf02289565

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.