The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Public Understanding of Science
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“This literature has largely rejected the 'knowledge deficit model' underlying the framing of public resistance to sciencebacked policies (Wynne 1991; 1992; 1995; 2006; Lewenstein 1992; Layton et al. 1993; Evans and Durant 1995; Irwin and Wynne 1996; Miller 2001; Jasanoff 2005).”
From Public Misunderstanding of Science? Reframing the Problem of Vaccine Hesitancy (2016) · cites this paper as Wynne 1995
In the citing paper
“Some have highlighted the 'contextual' nature of scientific knowledge-scientific facts are not as unproblematic as the deficit modellers assumed. Instead social context and lay knowledge play a significant role in how science is assimilated into public understanding (Wynne 1995; Irwin 1995; Brunk 2006).”
From Public Misunderstanding of Science? Reframing the Problem of Vaccine Hesitancy (2016) · cites this paper as Wynne 1995
Citations
Cites
Still being checked.
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Items 101–200 of 276
In backyards, on front lawns: examining informal risk communication and communicators
Rickard, L. N. (2010) · Public Understanding of Science · doi:10.1177/0963662509360295 · Cited by 19
Citizen interaction with computer models
Dahinden, U., Querol, C., Jäger, J., & Nilsson, M. (2003) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/cbo9780511490972.010 · Cited by 19
Activist trust: the diffusion of green expertise in a Brazilian landscape
Delgado, A. M. (2009) · Public Understanding of Science · doi:10.1177/0963662508098578 · Cited by 19
Ambivalencia e incertidumbre en las relaciones entre ciencia y sociedad
Blanco, J. R., & Iranzo, J. M. (2000) · Papers Revista de Sociologia · doi:10.5565/rev/papers/v61n0.1054 · Cited by 18
Public feeling for science: The Hwang affair and Hwang supporters
Kim, J. (2009) · Public Understanding of Science · doi:10.1177/0963662508096778 · Cited by 17
Brueckner, M., & Horwitz, P. (2005) · Sustainability Science Practice and Policy · doi:10.1080/15487733.2005.11907969 · Cited by 17
Tant qu’il y aura des « profanes »… dans la gestion des risques littoraux
Rocle, N., Bouet, B., Chasseriaud, S., & Lyser, S. (2016) · VertigO · doi:10.4000/vertigo.17646 · Cited by 17
Objectifying Uncertainty: History of Risk Concepts in Medicine
Schlich, T. (2004) · Topoi · doi:10.1007/s11245-004-5382-9 · Cited by 17
Putsche, L., Hormel, L., Mihelich, J. A., & Storrs, D. A. (2017) · Science Communication · doi:10.1177/1075547017730586 · Cited by 16
Ethical Reflection Must Always be Measured
Braun, K., Herrmann, S. L., Könninger, S., & Moore, A. (2010) · Science Technology & Human Values · doi:10.1177/0162243909357917 · Cited by 16
Science, religion, and nonreligion: Engaging subdisciplines to move further beyond mythbusting
Catto, R., Riley, J., Elsdon‐Baker, F., Jones, S., & Leicht, C. (2022) · Acta Sociologica · doi:10.1177/00016993221116248 · Cited by 14
Simulation Modelling as a Theory Building Tool: The Formation of Risk Perceptions
Bleda, M., & Shackley, S. J. (2012) · Journal of Artificial Societies and Social Simulation · doi:10.18564/jasss.1857 · Cited by 14
Statistics in science and in society: From a state-of-the-art to a new research agenda
von Roten, F. C., & de Roten, Y. (2013) · Public Understanding of Science · doi:10.1177/0963662513495769 · Cited by 14
Collage processes and citizens' visions for the future
Kasemir, B., Dahinden, U., Swartling, Å. G., Schibli, D., Schüle, R., Tàbara, J. D., & Jaeger, C. C. (2003) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/cbo9780511490972.009 · Cited by 14
Lay, S. (2008) · Journalism Studies · doi:10.1080/14616700701768063 · Cited by 14
Manufacturing Refused Knowledge in the Age of Epistemic Pluralism
Neresini, F., Agodi, M. C., Crabu, S., & Tosoni, S. (2024) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-981-99-7188-6 · Cited by 13
La perception des OGM par le public: remise en cause de quelques idées reçues
Marris, C. (2001) · Économie rurale · doi:10.3406/ecoru.2001.5276 · Cited by 13
Nuclear power debate and public opinion in Belarus: From Chernobyl to Ostrovets
Novikau, A. (2016) · Public Understanding of Science · doi:10.1177/0963662516647242 · Cited by 13
Tammpuu, P. (2004) · Trames Journal of the Humanities and Social Sciences · doi:10.3176/tr.2004.1/2.13 · Cited by 12
Rommetveit, K. (2021) · Routledge eBooks · doi:10.4324/9780429053061 · Cited by 13
Fernández‐Carro, R., Vílchez, J. E., González, J. M. V., & Ezquerra, Á. (2022) · Science & Education · doi:10.1007/s11191-022-00354-y · Cited by 11
Estudios de cultura científica en América Latina
Vaccarezza, L. S. (2009) · Redes Revista de Estudios Sociales de la Ciencia y la Tecnología · doi:10.48160/18517072re30.293 · Cited by 11
Stephens, K. K., & Barrett, A. K. (2014) · International Journal of Business Communication · doi:10.1177/2329488414525463 · Cited by 13
Boucher, A., Gaver, B., Kerridge, T., Michael, M., Ovalle, L., & Plummer-Fernandez, M. (2018) · Mattering Press eBooks · doi:10.28938/9780995527720 · Cited by 11
Vers la construction d’un public européen ?
Felt, U. (2010) · Questions de communication · doi:10.4000/questionsdecommunication.370 · Cited by 10
Public Proof in Courts and Jury Trials
Hildebrandt, M., & Gutwirth, S. (2008) · Science Technology & Human Values · doi:10.1177/0162243907306701 · Cited by 10
Debates in xenotransplantation: on the consequences of contradiction
Brown, N. (1999) · New Genetics and Society · doi:10.1080/14636779908656898 · Cited by 10
Linking the citizen to governance for sustainable climate futures
Stoll‐Kleemann, S., O’Riordan, T., & Burns, T. R. (2003) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/cbo9780511490972.020 · Cited by 10
Of publics and science: how publics engage with biotechnology and genomics
Dijkstra, A. M. (2008) · doi:10.3990/1.9789036526760 · Cited by 10
de Wit, S. (2020) · Global communications · doi:10.11647/obp.0212.05 · Cited by 9
Gendered contexts: Masculinity, knowledge, and attitudes toward biotechnology
Simon, R. M. (2009) · Public Understanding of Science · doi:10.1177/0963662509344272 · Cited by 9
A novel method for assessing integration activities in landscape management
Pearson, L. J., & Moon, K. (2014) · Landscape and Urban Planning · doi:10.1016/j.landurbplan.2014.06.008 · Cited by 9
Slayton, R. M. (2007) · Social Studies of Science · doi:10.1177/0306312706063787 · Cited by 9
Bio-objects and the media: the role of communication in bio-objectification processes
Maeseele, P. A., Allgaier, J., & Martinelli, L. (2013) · Croatian Medical Journal · doi:10.3325/cmj.2013.54.301 · Cited by 8
Ayaz, H., Çelik, M. H., Koytak, H. Z., & Yanik, I. E. (2024) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0308122 · Cited by 9
Science Cultures in a Diverse World: Knowing, Sharing, Caring
(2021) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-981-16-5379-7 · Cited by 8
Research Note a Comparative Study of the Politics of GM Food and Crops
Toke, D. (2004) · Political Studies · doi:10.1111/j.1467-9248.2004.00471.x · Cited by 8
‘Not Science but PR’: GM Food and the Makings of a Considered Sociology
Murcott, A. (1999) · Sociological Research Online · doi:10.5153/sro.325 · Cited by 8
Shaping the future of nanotechnology: a perspective on education, dissemination and ethics
Díaz, J., & Mendoza, J. (2025) · Frontiers in Nanotechnology · doi:10.3389/fnano.2025.1524578 · Cited by 7
Cardiff sciSCREEN: A model for using film screenings to engage publics in university research
Lewis, J., Bisson, S., Lewis, K. S., Reyes-Galindo, L. I., & Baldwin, A. J. (2017) · Research for All · doi:10.18546/rfa.01.1.08 · Cited by 7
Vásquez-Guevara, D. (2021) · Fonseca Journal of Communication · doi:10.14201/fjc-v22-22148 · Cited by 7
Allgaier, J. (2011) · Cultural Studies of Science Education · doi:10.1007/s11422-011-9330-x · Cited by 7
Lock, S. J. (2016) · Interdisciplinary Science Reviews · doi:10.1080/03080188.2016.1223581 · Cited by 7
COOL: Exploring options for carbon dioxide-reduction in a participatory mode
Tuinstra, W., van de Kerkhof, M., Hisschemoller, M., & MOL, A. P. J. (2003) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/cbo9780511490972.014 · Cited by 7
Communication and Knowledge Transfer on Climate Change in the Philippines
Friedrich, T. (2020) · Global communications · doi:10.11647/obp.0212.03 · Cited by 6
Between Science, Movement, and Democracy: Scientists for Future in the Politics–Society Interface
Herzog, L., Lenschow, A., & Pollex, J. (2023) · Politische Vierteljahresschrift · doi:10.1007/s11615-023-00464-4 · Cited by 7
Cientistas e leigos: uma questão de comunicação e cultura
Gonçalves, C. D. (2004) · Comunicação e Sociedade · doi:10.17231/comsoc.6(2004).1226 · Cited by 6
What science are you singing? A study of the science image in the mainstream music of Taiwan
Huang, C.-J., & Allgaier, J. (2014) · Public Understanding of Science · doi:10.1177/0963662514542565 · Cited by 6
Hildebrandt, M. (2014) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-3-319-04093-6_19 · Cited by 6
Technoscientific futures: Public framing of science
Ādamsone-Fiskoviča, A. (2014) · Technology in Society · doi:10.1016/j.techsoc.2014.06.001 · Cited by 6
Apoios de decisão: instrumento de auxílio à medicina baseada em preferências. Uma revisão conceitual
de Abreu, M. M., Kowalski, S. C., Ciconelli, R. M., & Ferraz, M. B. (2006) · Revista Brasileira de Reumatologia · doi:10.1590/s0482-50042006000400006 · Cited by 6
Summary: Key Features of the General Framework
Dreyer, M., Renn, O., Ely, A., Stirling, A., Vos, E., & Wendler, F. (2009) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-3-540-69309-3_11 · Cited by 6
Can We Look at Refused Knowledge Differently?
Neresini, F. (2024) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-981-99-7188-6_2 · Cited by 5
Goodwin, R. E., & Mullan, B. A. (2009) · British Food Journal · doi:10.1108/00070700910957267 · Cited by 5
Exploring the Image of Science: Neural Nets and the PIKA Model
van den Eynde, A. M., Laspra, B., & García, I. (2017) · Advances in Research · doi:10.9734/air/2017/33321 · Cited by 5
Kunovich, R. M. (2022) · Socius Sociological Research for a Dynamic World · doi:10.1177/23780231221093162 · Cited by 7
The Recent Public Understanding of Science Movement in Germany
Lehmkuhl, M. (2012) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-94-007-4279-6_8 · Cited by 5
Public Communication of Science and Technology in Taiwan
Huang, C.-J. (2015) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-981-287-472-6_14 · Cited by 5
Se confronter à l’engagement : discussion autour de trois perspectives critiques
Irwin, A. (2010) · Questions de communication · doi:10.4000/questionsdecommunication.376 · Cited by 5
On the art of scenario development
Anastasi, C. (2003) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/cbo9780511490972.016 · Cited by 5
Fensham, P. J. (2005) · Elsevier eBooks · doi:10.1016/b0-12-369398-5/00420-5 · Cited by 5
Doing STS Now: Of Hackers and Angels in Technoscience
Gül, Z., Harb, J. I., Ali, M. S., & Pandian, S. (2024) · Science Technology & Human Values · doi:10.1177/01622439241298009 · Cited by 5
Smart, G., & Falconer, M. (2021) · doi:10.1515/9788395720499-006 · Cited by 4
Espace public et culture scientifique
Maleki, K. (2014) · Sciences de la société · doi:10.4000/sds.1456 · Cited by 4
Barbolini, N. (2022) · Frontiers in Education · doi:10.3389/feduc.2022.852122 · Cited by 4
Socratic dialogue on responsible innovation – a methodological experiment in empirical ethics
Myskja, B. K., & Myklebust, A. (2023) · Etikk i praksis - Nordic Journal of Applied Ethics · doi:10.5324/eip.v17i1.4950 · Cited by 4
El discurso ausente: el caso del cambio climático
Gallego, M. J. C. (2020) · Papers Revista de Sociologia · doi:10.5565/rev/papers.2802 · Cited by 4
Palavecinos, M., Piñeiro, C., Díaz, M. J., & Ulloa, J. (2016) · Universitas Psychologica · doi:10.11144/javeriana.up14-4.cmgc · Cited by 4
Citizens' reports on climate strategies
Querol, C., Swartling, Å. G., Kasemir, B., & Tàbara, J. D. (2003) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/cbo9780511490972.011 · Cited by 4
Venture capital and climate policy
Kasemir, B., Tóth, F. L., & Masing, V. (2003) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/cbo9780511490972.013 · Cited by 4
Truth and Credibility in Science
Shapin, S. (2015) · Elsevier eBooks · doi:10.1016/b978-0-08-097086-8.85039-4 · Cited by 4
Evaluierung des "Diskurstag Gendiagnostik"
Felt, U., Fochler, M., & Strassnig, M. (2003) · doi:10.22163/fteval.2003.229 · Cited by 4
Relações ‘biossociais’: as associações de pacientes e a medicina regenerativa no Brasil
Acero, L. (2022) · Revista Tecnologia e Sociedade · doi:10.3895/rts.v18n51.13998 · Cited by 3
Investigating pre-service teachers’ use of social media for information about science
Fernández‐Carro, R., González, J. M. V., Vílchez, J. E., & Ezquerra, Á. (2024) · International Journal of Science Education Part B · doi:10.1080/21548455.2024.2342038 · Cited by 3
Animal Welfare: The Food Industry and Government
Hughes, D. (1997) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-1-4615-6221-4_12 · Cited by 3
The biopolitics of frozen embryos
Monti, M., & Redi, C. A. (2011) · The International Journal of Developmental Biology · doi:10.1387/ijdb.103281mm · Cited by 3
Who's Credible? Expressions of Consensus and Conflict in Focus Groups about DNA Patenting
Andreasen, M. (2009) · BioSocieties · doi:10.1017/s1745855209006413 · Cited by 3
“Green” food processing technologies: factors affecting consumers’ acceptance
Gauthier, E. (2011) · Food engineering series · doi:10.1007/978-1-4614-1587-9_23 · Cited by 4
Before and After Science: Science and Technology in Pop Music, 1970–1990
Bucchi, M., & Lorenzet, A. (2008) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-1-4020-8598-7_8 · Cited by 3
Expert stakeholder participation in the Thames region
Downing, T. E., Bakker, K., Lonsdale, K., Summerton, N., Swyngedouw, E. A., & Giansante, C. (2003) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/cbo9780511490972.015 · Cited by 3
From projects to program in integrated assessment research
van Asselt, M. B. A., & Rotmans, J. (2003) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/cbo9780511490972.018 · Cited by 3
Mahmud, S. (2020) · Global communications · doi:10.11647/obp.0212.06 · Cited by 3
Truth as what kind of functional myth for modern politics? A historical case study
Wynne, B. (2021) · Routledge eBooks · doi:10.4324/9780429053061-3 · Cited by 3
Self-citationClark, W. C., & Wokaun, A. J. (2003) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/cbo9780511490972.004 · Cited by 3
Rocle, N. (2017) · theses.fr (ABES) · doi:10.70675/fe5c8d3bzc8cbz4020zbe39z158d7c263752 · Cited by 3
Viglio, J. E. (2012) · doi:10.47749/t/unicamp.2012.894894 · Cited by 3
Spectacular Technology, Invisible Harms: Witnessing Techno-science on Waste Tours in China
Zhang, A. (2024) · Science Technology & Human Values · doi:10.1177/01622439231224503 · Cited by 2
Riley, J. (2024) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-3-031-66387-1_6 · Cited by 2
Meek, V. L. (2006) · Palgrave Macmillan US eBooks · doi:10.1057/9780230603165_12 · Cited by 2
Albert, K., & Gray, G. (2023) · Canadian Review of Sociology/Revue canadienne de sociologie · doi:10.1111/cars.12453 · Cited by 2
How experts understand the public in vaccination controversies in Chile
Villena, V. R., Jara, R., & Broitman, C. (2019) · Arbor · doi:10.3989/arbor.2019.794n4004 · Cited by 2
Francescutti, L. P. (2023) · Papeles del CEIC · doi:10.1387/pceic.23896 · Cited by 3
Microscópios, batas brancas e tubos de ensaio: Representações da ciência nas exposições científicas
Delicado, A. (2008) · Revista crítica de ciências sociais/Revista crítica de ciências sociais · doi:10.4000/rccs.454 · Cited by 2
Using Provocative Questions to Address Societal Health Issues
Kollmann, E. K., Reich, C. A., Bell, L., & Goss, J. (2010) · Museums & Social Issues · doi:10.1179/msi.2010.5.2.175 · Cited by 2
Divergence and convergence in nutrition science
Penders, B., Spruit, S. L., Sikkema, J., Maat, J., & Schuurbiers, D. (2015) · Trends in Food Science & Technology · doi:10.1016/j.tifs.2015.07.008 · Cited by 2
Foladori, G., García-Guerrero, M., & García-Guerrero, M. (2017) · Historia y Comunicación Social · doi:10.5209/hics.55909 · Cited by 2
Brüggemann, M., & Rödder, S. (2020) · Global communications · doi:10.11647/obp.0212.01 · Cited by 4
Lin, W.-Y. (2009) · East Asian Science Technology and Society An International Journal · doi:10.1007/s12280-009-9068-7 · Cited by 2
Blood-typing as a Pseudo-personality Theory and Diversity of Its Explanatory Styles
Uemura, A., & Sato, T. (2006) · The Japanese Journal of Personality · doi:10.2132/personality.15.33 · Cited by 2
Old Media, New Media, and Public Engagement with Science and Technology
Strekalova, Y. A., Krieger, J. L. R., Damiani, R. E., Kalyanaraman, S., & Wang, D. Z. (2016) · Advances in public policy and administration (APPA) book series · doi:10.4018/978-1-5225-1081-9.ch004 · Cited by 2
Metadata
- Authors
- WYNNE, B.
- Corresponding author
- WYNNE, BRIAN
- ORCID
- WYNNE, BRIAN
- Venue
- Handbook of Science and Technology Studies
- Publisher
- SAGE Publications, Inc.
- Published
- 1995
- Pages
- 361-388
- OpenAlex
- W2505745426
- Cited by
- 276
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 3 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 12 · 2023: 9 · 2022: 12 · 2021: 9 · 2020: 11 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 7 · 2017: 9 · 2016: 8 · 2015: 7 · 2014: 9 · 2013: 7 · 2012: 4
- FWCI
- 6.63
- Type
- book chapter
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Sage eBooks (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Science Education and Perceptions
- Social Sciences › Education › Science Education and Pedagogy
- Social Sciences › Political Science and International Relations › Science and Science Education
- Keywords
- public understanding of science, science communication, public attitudes toward science
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review