Cited by 60Survey Methodology and NonresponseFocus Groups and Qualitative MethodsMental Health Research Topics

The Emergence of Calendar Interviewing: A Theoretical and Empirical Rationale

Belli, Robert F., Callegaro, Mario·2009·Calendar and Time Diary

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.4135/9781412990295.d5

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The event-history calendar is a widely used instrument based on a graphical time frame that uses visual cues to facilitate autobiographic memory retrieval.

    “Romantic involvement was assessed by means of an event-history calendar (EHC; Belli and Callegaro 2009), a widely used instrument based on a graphical time frame that uses visual cues to facilitate autobiographic memory retrieval.”

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Belli, R. F., & Callegaro, M.
Venue
Calendar and Time Diary
Published
2009
Pages
31-52
OpenAlex
W2480850359
Cited by
60
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 4 · 2019: 5 · 2018: 3 · 2017: 9 · 2016: 6 · 2015: 2 · 2014: 4 · 2013: 4 · 2012: 3
FWCI
22.82
Type
book chapter
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Sage eBooks (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Survey Methodology and Nonresponse
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Focus Groups and Qualitative Methods
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Mental Health Research Topics
Keywords
interview scheduling

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review