Cited by 62Adolescent Sexual and Reproductive HealthMarriage and Sexual RelationshipsSex work and related issues

Social Exchange and Sexual Behavior in Young Women's Premarital Relationships in Kenya

Open access
Luke, Nancy, Goldberg, Rachel E., Mberu, Blessing U., Zulu, Eliya M.·2011·Journal of Marriage and Family

Abstract

Transactional sex, or the exchange of money and gifts for sexual activities within nonmarital relationships, has been widely considered a contributing factor to the disproportionate prevalence of HIV/AIDS among young women in sub-Saharan Africa. This study applied social exchange theory to premarital relationships in order to investigate the linkages between a variety of young women's resources-including employment and material transfers from male partners-and sexual behaviors. Data on the first month of premarital relationships (N=551 relationships) were collected from a random sample of young adult women ages 18-24 in Kisumu, Kenya, using a retrospective life history calendar. Consistent with the hypotheses, results showed that young women's income increases the likelihood of safer sexual activities, including delaying sex and using condoms consistently. Material transfers from the male partner displayed the opposite effect, supporting the view that resources obtained from within the relationship decrease young women's negotiating power.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/j.1741-3737.2011.00863.x

Cites

77 of 77 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 2

  1. Hope R 2007 Addressing cross-generational sex: A desk review of research and programs Washington, DC Population Reference Bureau
  2. Tanzania using five methods Sexually Transmitted Infections 80 Sii49 Sii56 PMC1765853 15572640

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Luke, N., Goldberg, R. E., Mberu, B. U., & Zulu, E. M.
Affiliations
  • Brown University (US)
  • African Population and Health Research Center (KE)
  • African Institute for Development Policy (KE)
Venue
Journal of Marriage and Family
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2011-09-28
Volume
73
Issue
5
Pages
1048-1064
ISSN
0022-2445 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2022110582
Cited by
62
References
77
Citations by year
2025: 2 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 6 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 9 · 2020: 7 · 2019: 4 · 2018: 5 · 2017: 1 · 2016: 2 · 2015: 7 · 2014: 5 · 2013: 5 · 2012: 3
FWCI
8.31
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of Marriage and the Family (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
Funders
Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development (R21HD053587, R24HD041020, T32HD007338)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Adolescent Sexual and Reproductive Health
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Marriage and Sexual Relationships
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Sex work and related issues
Keywords
transactional sex, social exchange theory, premarital relationships, young women, sexual behavior, HIV/AIDS risk, condom use, sexual initiation, material transfer, women's income, bargaining power, gender inequality, Kenya

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review