The DOI matches its Crossref record.
In Praise of Bureaucracy: Weber, Organization, Ethics
Abstract
In this provocative and critical new study of institutions management, ethics and contemporary society, Paul Du Gay reassesses management as a definitive phenomenon of the modern era, reinstating its relevance and exploring its future
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Clegg, S., Kornberger, M., & Rhodes, C. (2007) · British Journal of Management · doi:10.1111/j.1467-8551.2006.00493.x · Cited by 331
Pessimism, computer failure, and information systems development in the public sector
Goldfinch, S. (2007) · Public Administration Review · doi:10.1111/j.1540-6210.2007.00778.x · Cited by 283
Seven dimensions of contemporary participation disentangled
Kelty, C., Panofsky, A., Currie, M., Crooks, R., Erickson, S., Garcia, P., Wartenbe, M., & Wood, S. (2015) · Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology · doi:10.1002/asi.23202 · Cited by 124
General Sentiment: How Value and Affect Converge in the Information Economy
Arvidsson, A. (2011) · The Sociological Review · doi:10.1111/j.1467-954x.2012.02052.x · Cited by 103
Becoming digital – passages to service in the digitized bureaucracy
Pors, A. S. (2015) · Journal of Organizational Ethnography · doi:10.1108/joe-08-2014-0031 · Cited by 82
Metadata
- Authors
- du Gay, P.
- Venue
- SAGE Publications Ltd eBooks
- Publisher
- SAGE Publications Ltd
- Published
- 2000
- OpenAlex
- W4233972091
- Cited by
- 592
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 18.33
- Type
- book
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: In Praise of Bureaucracy: Weber, Organization, Ethics. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.4135/9781446217580
- The paper
- du Gay, P. (2000). In Praise of Bureaucracy: Weber, Organization, Ethics. SAGE Publications Ltd eBooks. https://doi.org/10.4135/9781446217580
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
