Becoming digital – passages to service in the digitized bureaucracy
Abstract
Purpose – The purpose of this paper is to examine the impact of e-government reforms on street-level bureaucrats’ professionalism and relation to citizens, thus demonstrating how the bureaucratic encounter unfolds in the digital era. Design/methodology/approach – The paper is based on an ethnographic study of frontline work at a citizen service centre in a Danish municipality, and draws on empirical material generated through observations, field notes, interviews and policy documents. Findings – The paper shows that e-government changes the mode of professionalism in citizen service from service to support. An ethnographic account of how digital reforms are implemented in practice shows how street-level bureaucrat’s classic tasks such as specialized casework are being reconfigured into educational tasks that promote the idea of “becoming digital”. In the paper, the author argues that the work of “becoming digital” in client processing entails two interconnected changes in frontline agents’ practice: de-specialization of the task and intensified informality in relation to citizens. As a result, the frontline agent works as an explorative generalist whose professional skills and personal competencies are blurred. Originality/value – The study contributes to ethnographic research in public administration by combining two separate subfields, e-government and street-level bureaucracy, to discern recent transformations in public service delivery. In the digital era, tasks, control…
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Cites
Street-Level Bureaucracy: Dilemmas of the Individual in Public Services
Lipsky, M. (1981) · Michigan Law Review · doi:10.2307/1288305 · Cited by 8,981 · see citing works
The second wave of digital-era governance: a quasi-paradigm for government on the Web
Margetts, H., & Dunleavy, P. (2013) · Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society A: Mathematical, Physical and Engineering Sciences · doi:10.1098/rsta.2012.0382 · Cited by 573 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Close encounters of the digital kind: A research agenda for the digitalization of public services
Lindgren, I., Madsen, C. Ø., Hofmann, S., & Melin, U. (2019) · Government Information Quarterly · doi:10.1016/j.giq.2019.03.002 · Cited by 517 · see citing works
Digital by default? A qualitative study of exclusion in digitalised welfare
Schou, J., & Pors, A. S. (2019) · Social Policy & Administration · doi:10.1111/spol.12470 · Cited by 229 · see citing works
Self-citationArtificial intelligence, bureaucratic form, and discretion in public service
Bullock, J., Young, M. M., & Wang, Y.-F. (2020) · Information Polity · doi:10.3233/ip-200223 · Cited by 139 · see citing works
Petrakaki, D. (2018) · International Journal of Public Sector Management · doi:10.1108/ijpsm-02-2017-0043 · Cited by 30 · see citing works
Research on digital discretion—The subjectification of street‐level work in public administration
Johansson, J. (2025) · Review of Policy Research · doi:10.1111/ropr.12637 · Cited by 19 · see citing works
- Authors
- Pors, A. S.
- Affiliations
- Metropolitan University College (DK)
- Corresponding author
- Pors, Anja Svejgaard
- ORCID
- Pors, Anja Svejgaard
- Venue
- Journal of Organizational Ethnography
- Publisher
- Emerald
- Published
- 2015-07-13
- Volume
- 4
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 177-192
- ISSN
- 2046-6749 (ISSN-L)
- 2046-6757
- OpenAlex
- W1580538803
- Cited by
- 82
- References
- 2
- Citations by year
- 2026: 3 · 2025: 12 · 2024: 9 · 2023: 18 · 2022: 8 · 2021: 5 · 2020: 10 · 2019: 3 · 2018: 7 · 2017: 3 · 2016: 3 · 2015: 1
- FWCI
- 30.25
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Journal of Organizational Ethnography (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Political Science and International Relations › E-Government and Public Services
- Social Sciences › Public Administration › Public Policy and Administration Research
- Social Sciences › Political Science and International Relations › Public Administration in Developing Nations
- Keywords
- e-government, street-level bureaucracy, professionalism, informality, public service delivery, digitalization of public administration, social casework
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review