The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Valence-Dependent Probability of Ingroup Favouritism between Minimal Groups: An Integrative View on the Positive-Negative Asymmetry in Social Discrimination
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“Allport (47) already conjectured that there is good reason to believe that the in-group love–prejudice effect is far more basic to human life than is the out-group hate–prejudice effect, and research on human ethnocentrism supported this positive–negative asymmetry of social discrimination (29, 48).”
From Oxytocin promotes human ethnocentrism (2011) · cites this paper as [48]
Citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Hewstone, M., Rubin, M., & Willis, H. (2002) · Annual Review of Psychology · doi:10.1146/annurev.psych.53.100901.135109 · Cited by 2,031
Oxytocin promotes human ethnocentrism
De Dreu, C. K. W., Greer, L. L., Van Kleef, G. A., Shalvi, S., & Handgraaf, M. J. J. (2011) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.1015316108 · Cited by 870
Metadata
- Authors
- Otten, S., & Mummendey, A.
- Venue
- Social Identity Processes: Trends in Theory and Research
- Publisher
- SAGE Publications Ltd
- Published
- 2000
- Pages
- 34-48
- Cited by
- 15
- References
- 0
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Valence-Dependent Probability of Ingroup Favouritism between Minimal Groups: An Integrative View on the Positive-Negative Asymmetry in Social Discrimination. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.4135/9781446218617.n3
- The paper
- Otten, S., & Mummendey, A. (2000). Valence-Dependent Probability of Ingroup Favouritism between Minimal Groups: An Integrative View on the Positive-Negative Asymmetry in Social Discrimination. Social Identity Processes: Trends in Theory and Research. https://doi.org/10.4135/9781446218617.n3