Cited by 0Geology and Paleoclimatology ResearchArchaeology and ancient environmental studiesGroundwater and Isotope Geochemistry

The DOI matches its Crossref record, with a small difference in title or year.

Cosmogenic nuclide dating

John A. Matthews·2014·Encyclopedia of Environmental Change

Abstract

How can we date rocks? | Using cosmogenic nuclides in glacial geology | Sampling strategies cosmogenic nuclide dating | Difficulties in cosmogenic nuclide dating | Calculating an exposure age | Further Reading | References | Comments | How can we date rocks? Cosmogenic nuclide dating can be used to determine rates of ice-sheet thinning and … Introduction to Cosmogenic nuclide dating Read More »

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.4135/9781446247501.n869

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Citations

Cites

Still being checked.

Cited by

Still being checked.

Metadata

Authors
Matthews, J. A.
Corresponding author
John A. Matthews
Venue
Encyclopedia of Environmental Change
Published
2014
OpenAlex
W4253572506
Cited by
0
References
0
Type
reference entry
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
SAGE Publications Ltd eBooks (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Earth and Planetary Sciences › Atmospheric Science › Geology and Paleoclimatology Research
  • Social Sciences › Archeology › Archaeology and ancient environmental studies
  • Physical Sciences › Earth and Planetary Sciences › Geochemistry and Petrology › Groundwater and Isotope Geochemistry
Keywords
cosmogenic nuclides, cosmogenic nuclide dating, surface exposure dating, geochronology, cosmic rays, environmental change

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review