Self-Verification Theory
Abstract
Self-verification theory proposes that people prefer others to see them as they see themselves, even if their self-views happen to be negative. For example, those who see themselves as likable want others to see them as such, and people who see themselves as dislikable want others to perceive ...
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
SFPs of trait ascriptions occurred only when ascribers were certain of the ascriptions, not when they were less confident.
“For several studies found that SFPs of trait ascriptions occurred only when ascribers were certain of the ascriptions, not when they were less confident (Swann and Ely 1984;Pelham and Swann 1994;Swann 2012: 30).”
From What Is the Function of Confirmation Bias? (2022) · cites this paper as Swann 2012: 30
No citation lists for this paper
No citation lists for this paper yet — checked again daily.
Cited by 553
- Authors
- Swann, W. B.
- Corresponding author
- Swann, William B.
- ORCID
- Swann, William B.
- Venue
- Handbook of Theories of Social Psychology
- Publisher
- SAGE Publications Ltd
- Published
- 2012-05-15
- Pages
- 23-42
- OpenAlex
- W2500736308
- Cited by
- 553
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 37 · 2025: 50 · 2024: 59 · 2023: 37 · 2022: 70 · 2021: 36 · 2020: 74 · 2019: 25 · 2018: 35 · 2017: 26 · 2016: 27 · 2015: 18 · 2014: 20 · 2013: 16 · 2012: 15
- FWCI
- 134.99
- Type
- book chapter
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- SAGE Publications Ltd eBooks (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Social and Intergroup Psychology
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Personality Traits and Psychology
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Death Anxiety and Social Exclusion
- Keywords
- self-verification theory, self-concept, self-perception, social perception, interpersonal perception, self-view, likeability
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review