The Role of Assessment in Developing Motivation for Learning
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Teachers often use traditional forms of teacher-graded assessment to motivate, support and cajole students.
“For example, on a personal level, teachers will often use traditional forms of teacher-graded assessment to motivate, support and cajole students (Cauley & McMillan, 2010;Harlen, 2012).”
From Assessment in the age of artificial intelligence (2022) · cites this paper as Harlen, 2012
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Assessment in the age of artificial intelligence
Swiecki, Z., Khosravi, H., Chen, G., Martinez-Maldonado, R., Lodge, J. M., Milligan, S., Selwyn, N., & Gašević, D. (2022) · Computers and Education: Artificial Intelligence · doi:10.1016/j.caeai.2022.100075 · Cited by 409 · see citing works
Webb-Williams, J. (2018) · Research in Science Education · doi:10.1007/s11165-016-9592-0 · Cited by 94 · see citing works
- Authors
- Harlen, W.
- Corresponding author
- Harlen, Wynne
- Venue
- Assessment and Learning
- Publisher
- SAGE Publications Ltd
- Published
- 2012
- Pages
- 171-184
- OpenAlex
- W2496676446
- Cited by
- 84
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2025: 3 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 9 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 6 · 2020: 5 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 1 · 2017: 7 · 2016: 9 · 2015: 6 · 2014: 7 · 2013: 4 · 2012: 8
- FWCI
- 38.38
- Type
- book chapter
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- SAGE Publications Ltd eBooks (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Education › Student Assessment and Feedback
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Education, Achievement, and Giftedness
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Educational and Psychological Assessments
- Keywords
- assessment, student motivation, motivation formation, educational assessment
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
