Cited by 94Education, Achievement, and GiftednessCareer Development and DiversityScience Education and Pedagogy

Science Self-Efficacy in the Primary Classroom: Using Mixed Methods to Investigate Sources of Self-Efficacy

Webb-Williams, Jane·2018·Research in Science Education

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/s11165-016-9592-0

Cites

94 of 94 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Webb-Williams, J.
Affiliations
University of South Australia (AU)
Corresponding author
Webb-Williams, Jane
Venue
Research in Science Education
Published
2017-04-27
Volume
48
Issue
5
Pages
939-961
ISSN
  • 0157-244X (ISSN-L)
  • 1573-1898
OpenAlex
W2609943750
Cited by
94
References
94
Citations by year
2026: 8 · 2025: 13 · 2024: 15 · 2023: 11 · 2022: 18 · 2021: 12 · 2020: 10 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 5
FWCI
6.06
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Research in Science Education (publishedVersion)
  • UniSA Research Outputs Repository (University of South Australia) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Education, Achievement, and Giftedness
  • Social Sciences › Safety Research › Career Development and Diversity
  • Social Sciences › Education › Science Education and Pedagogy
Keywords
science self-efficacy, elementary school students, sources of self-efficacy, mastery experiences, vicarious experience, verbal persuasion, self-regulation, gender differences, girls in science, social comparison, teacher feedback, heuristic processing, scientific careers

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review