The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Why Voice Matters: Culture and Politics after Neoliberalism
Abstract
For more than thirty years neoliberalism has declared that market functioning trumps all other social, political and economic values. In this book, Nick Couldry passionately argues for voice, the effective opportunity for people to speak and be heard on what affects their lives, as the only value that can truly challenge neoliberal politics. But having voice is not enough: we need to know our voice matters. Insisting that the answer goes much deeper than simply calling for 'more voices', whether on the streets or in the media, Couldry presents a dazzling range of analysis from the real world of Blair and Obama to the social theory of Judith Butler and Amartya Sen. \n \nWhy Voice Matters breaks open the contradictions in neoliberal thought and shows how the mainstream media not only fails to provide the means for people to give an account of themselves, but also reinforces neoliberal values. Moving beyond the despair common to much of today's analysis, Couldry shows us a vision of a democracy based on social cooperation and offers the resources we need to build a new post-neoliberal politics.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“When these regularities increasingly define how music is tagged, recommended, and publicly recognized, communities whose traditions are poorly represented lose interpretive authority over their own cultural forms (Couldry 2010;Drott 2021).”
From The Algorithmic Flattening of Sound: Computational Evidence and Justice Implications of AI Music Homogenization (2026) · cites this paper as Couldry 2010
Citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Driessens, O. (2013) · International Journal of Cultural Studies · doi:10.1177/1367877912459140 · Cited by 332
Do Algorithms Shape Character? Considering Algorithmic Ethical Subjectivation
Magalhães, J. C. (2018) · Social Media + Society · doi:10.1177/2056305118768301 · Cited by 52
Slendebroek, Z., & Metaxa, D. (2026) · Proceedings of the AAAI/ACM Conference on AI, Ethics, and Society · doi:10.1609/aies.v9i4.43312
Metadata
- Authors
- Couldry, N.
- Publisher
- SAGE Publications Ltd
- Published
- 2010
- Cited by
- 743
- References
- 0
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review