Multilevel Modeling for Social and Personality Psychology
Abstract
Introduction Multilevel Random Coefficient Models Basics Multilevel Random Coefficient Models Some Advanced Topics Conceptualizing the Multilevel Structure Using HLM
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The analytic approach of recentering to calculate simple effects is widely used and has been applied to multilevel modeling.
“This analytic approach is widely used (Cohen, Cohen, West, & Aiken, 2003) and has been previously applied to multilevel modeling (Nezlek, 2011).”
From Commitment to a purpose in life: An antidote to the suffering by individuals with social anxiety disorder. (2013) · cites this paper as Nezlek, 2011
No citation lists for this paper
No citation lists for this paper yet — checked again daily.
Cited by 262
- Authors
- Nezlek, J.
- Affiliations
- William & Mary (US)
- Corresponding author
- Nezlek, John
- ORCID
- Nezlek, John
- Venue
- SAGE Publications Ltd eBooks
- Publisher
- SAGE Publications Ltd
- Published
- 2011
- OpenAlex
- W636455294
- Cited by
- 262
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 7 · 2025: 10 · 2024: 10 · 2023: 19 · 2022: 15 · 2021: 31 · 2020: 29 · 2019: 24 · 2018: 13 · 2017: 19 · 2016: 19 · 2015: 15 · 2014: 15 · 2013: 17 · 2012: 14
- FWCI
- 5.16
- Type
- book
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- SAGE Publications Ltd eBooks (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Mathematics › Statistics and Probability › Statistical Methods and Bayesian Inference
- Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Management Science and Operations Research › Psychometric Methodologies and Testing
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Mental Health Research Topics
- Keywords
- multilevel modeling, random coefficient models, multilevel analysis, social psychology, personality psychology, multilevel structure
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
