The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Improving Intergroup Relations
Abstract
This book is intended both as supplementary reading for courses and as a practical guidebook for individuals and programmes interested in reducing prejudice and improving intergroup relations. It provides the only comprehensive review and compilation of techniques for roving intergroup relations
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“The most successful way to alleviate intergroup anxiety and increase provider confidence is through direct “contact” with members of other groups.71,72”
From Reducing Racial Bias Among Health Care Providers: Lessons from Social-Cognitive Psychology (2007) · cites this paper as [72]
Citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Prejudice Reduction: What Works? A Review and Assessment of Research and Practice
Paluck, E. L., & Green, D. P. (2009) · Annual Review of Psychology · doi:10.1146/annurev.psych.60.110707.163607 · Cited by 1,376
“Other reviews cover a broad range of prejudicereduction programs and the theories that underlie them (e.g., Oskamp 2000, Stephan & Stephan 2001).”
BackgroundMethodReducing intergroup prejudice and conflict using the media: A field experiment in Rwanda.
Paluck, E. L. (2009) · Journal of Personality and Social Psychology · doi:10.1037/a0011989 · Cited by 902
Intergroup Contact: The Past, Present, and the Future
Dovidio, J. F., Gaertner, S. L., & Kawakami, K. (2003) · Group Processes & Intergroup Relations · doi:10.1177/1368430203006001009 · Cited by 756
“An emphasis on learning new information is a critical component of multicultural education programs for improving intergroup relations (Stephan & Stephan, 2001).”
BackgroundA Developmental Model of Intercultural Maturity
King, P. M., & Magolda, M. B. B. (2005) · Journal of college student development · doi:10.1353/csd.2005.0060 · Cited by 585
“The effects of participation in these dialogues are impressive (see Hurtado, 2001, and Stephan and Stephan, 2001, for details of these studies): [D]ialogue participation is linked with positive effects on cognitive outcomes such as knowledge about other groups and discrimination in society,…”
BackgroundUsing Empathy to Improve Intergroup Attitudes and Relations
Batson, C. D., & Ahmad, N. Y. (2009) · Social Issues and Policy Review · doi:10.1111/j.1751-2409.2009.01013.x · Cited by 508
Metadata
- Authors
- Stephan, W., & Stephan, C.
- Affiliations
- New Mexico State University (US)
- Venue
- Sage eBooks
- Publisher
- SAGE Publications, Inc.
- Published
- 2001
- OpenAlex
- W561451879
- Cited by
- 401
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 8 · 2025: 11 · 2024: 20 · 2023: 26 · 2022: 6 · 2021: 7 · 2020: 5 · 2019: 13 · 2018: 29 · 2017: 14 · 2016: 17 · 2015: 18 · 2014: 12 · 2013: 18 · 2012: 19
- FWCI
- 17.62
- Type
- book
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Sage eBooks (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Social and Intergroup Psychology
- Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Social Power and Status Dynamics
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Death Anxiety and Social Exclusion
- Keywords
- intergroup relations, prejudice reduction, intergroup contact, group psychology
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
