The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Evaluative Inquiry for Learning in Organizations
Abstract
'Evaluative Inquiry for Learning in Organizations' shows a way to conduct evaluative inquiry in any kind of organisation. The approach is data-based, and the focus on use within organisations
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
An instructional strategy framework for online learning environments
Johnson, S. D., & Aragon, S. R. (2003) · New Directions for Adult and Continuing Education · doi:10.1002/ace.117 · Cited by 364
Teacher Teams and Distributed Leadership: A Study of Group Discourse and Collaboration
Scribner, J. P., Sawyer, R. K., Watson, S. T., & Myers, V. L. (2007) · Educational Administration Quarterly · doi:10.1177/0013161x06293631 · Cited by 344
Utilization-Focused evaluation
Patton, M. Q. (2003) · International Handbook of Educational Evaluation · doi:10.1007/978-94-010-0309-4_15 · Cited by 334
Professional development for teachers: A world of change
Collinson, V., Kozina, E., Kate Lin, Y., Ling, L., Matheson, I., Newcombe, L., & Zogla, I. (2009) · European Journal of Teacher Education · doi:10.1080/02619760802553022 · Cited by 188
Creating a culture of data use for continuous improvement: A case study of an Edison Project school
Sutherland, S. (2004) · American Journal of Evaluation · doi:10.1177/109821400402500302 · Cited by 106
Metadata
- Authors
- Preskill, H., & Torres, R.
- Venue
- Sage eBooks
- Publisher
- SAGE Publications, Inc.
- Published
- 1999
- OpenAlex
- W573554305
- Cited by
- 457
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 19.80
- Type
- book
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Evaluative Inquiry for Learning in Organizations. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.4135/9781452231488
- The paper
- Preskill, H., & Torres, R. (1999). Evaluative Inquiry for Learning in Organizations. Sage eBooks. https://doi.org/10.4135/9781452231488
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
