Cited by 47Meta-analysis and systematic reviewsMethodologies in Health Research and PracticeHealth Policy Implementation Science

The Scoping Review Method: Mapping the Literature in “Structural Change” Public Health Interventions

Open access
Hanneke, Rosie, Asada, Yuka, Lieberman, Lisa, Neubauer, Leah Christina, Fagen, Michael·2017·SAGE Publications Ltd eBooks

Abstract

This case discusses how we used scoping review methodology to map the literature in an emergent area of research, “structural change” public health interventions. Scoping reviews are similar to systematic reviews in both scale and rigor; both of these literature review methodologies are comprehensive approaches to reviewing the literature on a topic. However, while a systematic review attempts to answer a specific, targeted research question, a scoping review is designed to map and categorize all of the literature on a broad topic. For this reason, it is an excellent method to employ in emergent research areas, in which researchers have not yet conducted systematic reviews or otherwise attempted to record the entirety of a scholarly conversation. In this case report, we discuss advantages and disadvantages to the methodology, as well as the lessons we learned from our experience, and our recommendations for researchers who utilize this method. We encountered challenges including time limitations, finding a balance between a search strategy that was neither too narrow nor too broad, and adjusting the search throughout the process to accommodate new vocabulary terms as we discovered them.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.4135/9781473999008

Cites

3 of 3 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • A scoping review is useful for mapping the available literature on a given topic, particularly when there is a dearth of literature.

    “A scoping review is useful for mapping the available literature on a given topic, particularly when there is a dearth of literature (Hanneke et al., 2017; Munn et al., 2018).”

    From Sextortion: A Scoping Review (2025) · cites this paper as Hanneke et al., 2017

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Hanneke, R., Asada, Y., Lieberman, L., Neubauer, L. C., & Fagen, M.
Venue
SAGE Publications Ltd eBooks
Published
2017
OpenAlex
W2575222574
Cited by
47
References
3
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 11 · 2023: 13 · 2022: 8 · 2021: 4 · 2020: 4 · 2017: 1
Type
reference entry
Language
en
Open access
Licence
cc-by
Locations
  • SAGE Publications Ltd eBooks (publishedVersion)
  • Figshare (submittedVersion, cc-by)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Statistics, Probability and Uncertainty › Meta-analysis and systematic reviews
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › Health Information Management › Methodologies in Health Research and Practice
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Health Policy Implementation Science
Keywords
scoping review, public health interventions, literature mapping, search strategy design

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review