The DOI matches its Crossref record.
International Society for Technology in Education
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Technological Pedagogical Content Knowledge: A Framework for Teacher Knowledge
Mishra, P., & Koehler, M. J. (2006) · Teachers College Record: The Voice of Scholarship in Education · doi:10.1111/j.1467-9620.2006.00684.x · Cited by 12,604
Teacher Technology Change: How Knowledge, Confidence, Beliefs, and Culture Intersect
Ertmer, P. A., & Ottenbreit-Leftwich, A. T. (2010) · Journal of Research on Technology in Education · doi:10.1080/15391523.2010.10782551 · Cited by 2,556
Conditions for Classroom Technology Innovations
Zhao, Y., Pugh, K., Sheldon, S., & Byers, J. L. (2002) · Teachers College Record: The Voice of Scholarship in Education · doi:10.1111/1467-9620.00170 · Cited by 855
Digital storytelling: a meaningful technology-integrated approach for engaged student learning
Sadik, A. (2008) · Educational Technology Research and Development · doi:10.1007/s11423-008-9091-8 · Cited by 802
A review of pedagogy related to information and communications technology
Webb, M., & Cox, M. (2004) · Technology, Pedagogy and Education · doi:10.1080/14759390400200183 · Cited by 386
Metadata
- Venue
- The SAGE Encyclopedia of Online Education
- Publisher
- SAGE Publications, Inc.
- Published
- 2016
- OpenAlex
- W268320509
- Cited by
- 1,021
- References
- 0
- Type
- reference entry
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: International Society for Technology in Education. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.4135/9781483318332.n193
- The paper
- International Society for Technology in Education. (2016). The SAGE Encyclopedia of Online Education. https://doi.org/10.4135/9781483318332.n193
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.