The DOI matches its Crossref record; 38 of the 38 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Conditions for Classroom Technology Innovations
Abstract
This article reports on a study of the complex and messy process of classroom technology integration. The main purpose of the study was to empirically address the large question of “why don't teachers innovate when they are given computers?” rather than whether computers can improve student learning. Specifically, we were interested in understanding the conditions under which technology innovation can take place in classrooms. For a year, we followed a group of K–12 teachers who attempted to carry out technology-rich projects in their classrooms. These teachers were selected from more than 100 recipients of a technology grant program for teachers. The study found 11 salient factors that significantly impact the degree of success of classroom technology innovations. Some of these factors have been commonly mentioned in the literature, but our study found new dimensions to them. Others have not been identified in the literature. Each factor can be placed in one of three interactive domains, the teacher, the innovation, and the context. The article discusses the 11 factors in detail and proposes a model of the relationship among the different factors and their domains.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Basics of Qualitative Research: Grounded Theory Procedures and Techniques.
Ellis, C., Strauss, A., & Corbin, J. (1992) · Contemporary Sociology · doi:10.2307/2074814 · Cited by 29,249
Basics of Qualitative Research: Grounded Theory Procedures and Techniques
Long, D. R., Strauss, A., & Corbin, J. (1993) · The Modern Language Journal · doi:10.2307/328955 · Cited by 17,576
Handbook of research on teaching
Wittrock, M. C. (1986) · Bibliothèque et Archives nationales du Québec (Québec government) · Cited by 10,626
The New Meaning of Educational Change
(2013) · Routledge eBooks · doi:10.4324/9780203609071 · Cited by 8,220
Central Problems in Social Theory: Action, structure and contradiction in social analysis
Giddens, A. (1979) · Bloomsbury Publishing Plc eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-1-349-16161-4 · Cited by 7,939
Language as social semiotic : the social interpretation of language and meaning
Halliday, M. A. K. (1978) · Cited by 5,776
Handbook of educational psychology
(1997) · Choice Reviews Online · doi:10.5860/choice.34-3084 · Cited by 4,825
The New Meaning of Educational Change
Fullan, M. (2001) · doi:10.4324/9780203986561 · Cited by 4,373
Handbook of Educational Psychology
(2013) · Routledge eBooks · doi:10.4324/9780203053874 · Cited by 3,212
Gunderman, R. B. (2011) · Achieving Excellence in Medical Education · doi:10.1007/978-0-85729-307-7_10 · Cited by 2,892
Cited by
Teacher Technology Change: How Knowledge, Confidence, Beliefs, and Culture Intersect
Ertmer, P. A., & Ottenbreit-Leftwich, A. T. (2010) · Journal of Research on Technology in Education · doi:10.1080/15391523.2010.10782551 · Cited by 2,556
Teacher beliefs and technology integration practices: A critical relationship
Ertmer, P. A., Ottenbreit-Leftwich, A. T., Sadik, O., Sendurur, E., & Sendurur, P. (2012) · Computers & Education · doi:10.1016/j.compedu.2012.02.001 · Cited by 2,107
Factors Affecting Technology Uses in Schools: An Ecological Perspective
Zhao, Y., & Frank, K. A. (2003) · American Educational Research Journal · doi:10.3102/00028312040004807 · Cited by 947
Self-citationDigital Natives As Preservice Teachers: What Technology Preparation Is Needed?
Lei, J. (2009) · Journal of Computing in Teacher Education · doi:10.1080/10402454.2009.10784615 · Cited by 386
Impact of ChatGPT on Learning Motivation: Teachers and Students' Voices
Ali, J. K. M., Shamsan, M. A. A., Hezam, T. A., & Mohammed, A. A. Q. (2023) · Journal of English Studies in Arabia Felix · doi:10.56540/jesaf.v2i1.51 · Cited by 335
Metadata
- Authors
- Zhao, Y., Pugh, K., Sheldon, S., & Byers, J. L.
- Venue
- Teachers College Record: The Voice of Scholarship in Education
- Publisher
- SAGE Publications
- Published
- 2002-03
- Volume
- 104
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 482-515
- ISSN
- 0040-0475 (ISSN-L)
- 0161-4681
- 1467-9620
- OpenAlex
- W2111890388
- Cited by
- 855
- References
- 38
- FWCI
- 89.34
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Conditions for Classroom Technology Innovations. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1111/1467-9620.00170
- The paper
- Zhao, Y., Pugh, K., Sheldon, S., & Byers, J. L. (2002). Conditions for Classroom Technology Innovations. Teachers College Record: The Voice of Scholarship in Education. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9620.00170
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.