The DOI matches its Crossref record; 94 of the 94 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Stigma, Prejudice, and Violence Against Lesbians and Gay Men
Abstract
Institutional and personal hostility toward lesbians and gay men is a fact of life in the United States today. At the cultural level, homosexuality remains stigmatized through institutional policies. Statutes prohibiting antigay discrimination in employment, housing, and services are in force in only two states (Wisconsin and Massachusetts), the District of Columbia, and a few dozen municipalities and local jurisdictions (e.g., San Francisco, New York, Chicago). Lesbian and gay military personnel are subject to discharge if their sexual orientation is discovered, no matter how exemplary their service records. Gay civilians routinely are denied government security clearances, or are subjected to more intensive investigation than are heterosexual applicants. Lesbian and gay relationships generally are not legally recognized and, in 24 states and the District of Columbia, the partners in same-sex relationships are forbidden by law from private sexual contact (e.g., Herek, 1989, 1990a; Melton, 1989; Rivera, this volume). Many individual heterosexuals’ attitudes toward gay men and women are consistent with this institutional hostility. Roughly two-thirds of Americans condemn homosexuality or homosexual behavior as morally wrong or a sin (e.g., polls by ABC, 8/87; Los Angeles Times, 8/87; Roper, 9/85); this pattern appears not to have changed significantly from the late 1970s (e.g., polls by Yankelovich, 3/78; Gallup,
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Judgment under Uncertainty: Heuristics and Biases
Tversky, A., & Kahneman, D. (1975) · Utility, Probability, and Human Decision Making · doi:10.1007/978-94-010-1834-0_8 · Cited by 22,650
(1954) · Cited by 15,935
Stigma: Notes on the Management of Spoiled Identity
(1969) · Postgraduate Medical Journal · doi:10.1136/pgmj.45.527.642 · Cited by 14,231
Erikson, E. H. (2026) · Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research) · doi:10.5281/zenodo.18614668 · Cited by 11,235
Adorno, T. W., Frenkel-Brunswick, E., Levinson, D., & Sandford, R. N. (2001) · Racism: Essential Readings · doi:10.4135/9781446220986.n8 · Cited by 6,456
Judgment Under Uncertainty: Heuristics and Biases.
Shafer, G. R., Kahnerman, D., Slovic, P., & Tversky, A. (1984) · Journal of the American Statistical Association · doi:10.2307/2288362 · Cited by 5,657
Human Groups and Social Categories: Studies in Social Psychology.
Rose, A., & Tajfel, H. (1983) · Contemporary Sociology · doi:10.2307/2066820 · Cited by 4,110
Social Stigma: The Psychology of Marked Relationships.
Hilbert, R. A., Jones, E. E., Farina, A., Hastorf, A. H., Markus, H., Miller, D. T., & Scott, R. A. (1985) · Contemporary Sociology · doi:10.2307/2071381 · Cited by 1,877
Enemies of freedom: understanding right-wing authoritarianism
(1989) · Choice Reviews Online · doi:10.5860/choice.26-3934 · Cited by 1,567
Cognitive Processes in Stereotyping and Intergroup Behavior
(2015) · Psychology Press eBooks · doi:10.4324/9781315668758 · Cited by 1,476
Cited by
Beyond “Homophobia”: Thinking about sexual prejudice and stigma in the twenty-first century
Herek, G. M. (2004) · Sexuality Research and Social Policy · doi:10.1525/srsp.2004.1.2.6 · Cited by 1,029
Self-citationHerek, G. M., & Capitanio, J. P. (1996) · Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin · doi:10.1177/0146167296224007 · Cited by 874
Self-citationSex Differences in Attitudes Toward Homosexual Persons, Behaviors, and Civil Rights A Meta-Analysis
Kite, M. E., & Whitley, B. E. (1996) · Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin · doi:10.1177/0146167296224002 · Cited by 835
D'Augelli, A. R., Hershberger, S. L., & Pilkington, N. W. (1998) · American Journal of Orthopsychiatry · doi:10.1037/h0080345 · Cited by 640
Guidelines for psychological practice with lesbian, gay, and bisexual clients.
American Psychological Association (2012) · American Psychologist · doi:10.1037/a0024659 · Cited by 624
Metadata
- Authors
- Herek, G.
- Venue
- Homosexuality: Research Implications for Public Policy
- Publisher
- SAGE Publications, Inc.
- Published
- 1991
- Pages
- 60-80
- OpenAlex
- W2480724381
- Cited by
- 293
- References
- 94
- FWCI
- 15.60
- Type
- book chapter
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Stigma, Prejudice, and Violence Against Lesbians and Gay Men. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.4135/9781483325422.n5
- The paper
- Herek, G. (1991). Stigma, Prejudice, and Violence Against Lesbians and Gay Men. Homosexuality: Research Implications for Public Policy. https://doi.org/10.4135/9781483325422.n5
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.