The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Design and Evaluation of Survey Questions
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“We used an interview protocol to increase reliability (Fowler & Cosenza, 2009).”
From Instructional Designers’ Perceptions of Accessible and Inclusive Online Course Design (2024) · cites this paper as Fowler & Cosenza, 2009
Citations
Cites
Still being checked.
Cited by
Sorted by citations
for the HIV/AIDS Prevention Research Synthesis Team, Herbst, J. H., Jacobs, E. D., Finlayson, T. J., McKleroy, V. S., Neumann, M. S., & Crepaz, N. (2008) · AIDS and Behavior · doi:10.1007/s10461-007-9299-3 · Cited by 933
Matthews, R. A., Pineault, L., & Hong, Y.-H. (2022) · Journal of Business and Psychology · doi:10.1007/s10869-022-09813-3 · Cited by 528
Nakayama, K., Osaka, W., Togari, T., Ishikawa, H., Yonekura, Y., Sekido, A., & Matsumoto, M. (2015) · BMC Public Health · doi:10.1186/s12889-015-1835-x · Cited by 338
Does gender matter in cyberbullying perpetration? An empirical investigation
Wong, R. Y. M., Cheung, C. M. K., & Xiao, B. S. (2017) · Computers in Human Behavior · doi:10.1016/j.chb.2017.10.022 · Cited by 159
Assessing the importance of cultural ecosystem services in urban areas of Beijing municipality
Dou, Y., Zhen, L., de Groot, R. S., Bingzhen, D., & Yu, X. (2017) · Ecosystem Services · doi:10.1016/j.ecoser.2017.02.011 · Cited by 138
Metadata
- Authors
- Fowler, F., & Cosenza, C.
- Venue
- The SAGE Handbook of Applied Social Research Methods
- Publisher
- SAGE Publications, Inc.
- Published
- 2009
- Pages
- 375-412
- OpenAlex
- W2486752955
- Cited by
- 172
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 7 · 2025: 7 · 2024: 13 · 2023: 12 · 2022: 11 · 2021: 14 · 2020: 14 · 2019: 8 · 2018: 12 · 2017: 9 · 2016: 6 · 2015: 7 · 2014: 8 · 2013: 9 · 2012: 7
- FWCI
- 43.93
- Type
- book chapter
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Sage eBooks (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Survey Methodology and Nonresponse
- Physical Sciences › Mathematics › Statistics and Probability › Survey Sampling and Estimation Techniques
- Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Management Science and Operations Research › Psychometric Methodologies and Testing
- Keywords
- questionnaire development, survey evaluation, questionnaire design
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
