The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
The SAGE Encyclopedia of Communication Research Methods
Abstract
Structural equation modeling (SEM) is a versatile tool for conducting a wide range of multivariate statistical analyses, including multiple regression, mediation analysis, moderation analysis, and analyses of variance and covariance. Two specialized uses of SEM that appear frequently in communication research are confirmatory factor analysis (CFA) and path analysis. Confirmatory factor analysis specifies one or more unobserved constructs, or latent factors, that a number of observed indicators define. This analysis is useful for validating the composition of multiple-item indices or scales. The other common use of SEM, path analysis, estimates correlation and regression paths among structural nodes, which may include both observed variables and latent factors. When path analysis includes latent factors, the definition of those factors is equivalent to CFA and is the basis of a measurement model. The specification of paths among latent factors and observed variables constitutes a structural model. Whatever the intended use of SEM in communication research, it should be based on careful theoretical considerations. This entry conducts a detailed examination of the general approaches researchers can take to utilize SEM, as well as its various uses.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“We note that the prominent use of proactive corroboration might have been influenced by the research setting, possibly due to biases related to social interaction during the study [50].”
From When the source is a bot: How people adapt their evaluation strategies to assess AI-generated content (2026) · cites this paper as [50]
In the citing paper
“This format balances a guiding framework with flexibility, enabling both broad understanding and in-depth insights [50] (see S6 File).”
From When the source is a bot: How people adapt their evaluation strategies to assess AI-generated content (2026) · cites this paper as [50]
In the citing paper
“Furthermore, the performance task took place in a lab setting, likely increasing participant effort and introducing bias, as actions may align with perceived expectations [50].”
From When the source is a bot: How people adapt their evaluation strategies to assess AI-generated content (2026) · cites this paper as [50]
Citations
Cites
Hu, L., & Bentler, P. M. (1999) · Structural Equation Modeling A Multidisciplinary Journal · doi:10.1080/10705519909540118 · Cited by 108,788
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Searching for the backfire effect: Measurement and design considerations.
Swire-Thompson, B., DeGutis, J., & Lazer, D. (2020) · Journal of Applied Research in Memory and Cognition · doi:10.1016/j.jarmac.2020.06.006 · Cited by 360
Machine learning and digital biomarkers can detect early stages of neurodegenerative diseases
Chudzik, A., Śledzianowski, A., & Przybyszewski, A. W. (2024) · Sensors · doi:10.3390/s24051572 · Cited by 122
Alqarni (2024) · doi:10.1016/j.caeai.2024.100205 · Cited by 62
Longitudinal associations between time spent using technology and sleep duration among adolescents☆
Mazzer, K., Bauducco, S., Linton, S. J., & Boersma, K. (2018) · Journal of Adolescence · doi:10.1016/j.adolescence.2018.05.004 · Cited by 53
Rossi, R., Nairn, A., Smith, J., & Inskip, C. (2021) · Journal of Public Policy & Marketing · doi:10.1177/0743915621999674 · Cited by 50
Metadata
- Authors
- Allen, M.
- Publisher
- SAGE Publications, Inc
- Published
- 2017
- Cited by
- 1,103
- References
- 1
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: The SAGE Encyclopedia of Communication Research Methods. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.4135/9781483381411
- The paper
- Allen, M. (2017). The SAGE Encyclopedia of Communication Research Methods. https://doi.org/10.4135/9781483381411