The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Experimental Design: Procedures for the Behavioral Sciences
Abstract
Chapter 1. Research Strategies and the Control of Nuisance Variables Chapter 2. Experimental Designs: an Overview Chapter 3. Fundamental Assumptions in Analysis of Variance Chapter 4. Completely Randomized Design Chapter 5. Multiple Comparison Tests Chapter 6. Trend Analysis Chapter 7. General Linear Model Approach to ANOVA Chapter 8. Randomized Block Designs Chapter 9. Completely Randomized Factorial Design with Two Treatments Chapter 10. Completely Randomized Factorial Design with Three or More Treatments and Randomized Block Factorial Design Chapter 11. Hierarchical Designs Chapter 12. Split-Plot Factorial Design: Design with Group-Treatment Confounding Chapter 13. Analysis of Covariance Chapter 14. Latin Square and Related Designs Chapter 15. Confounded Factorial Designs: Designs with Group-Interaction Confounding Chapter 16. Fractional Factorial Designs: Designs with Treatment-Interaction Confounding
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“As cross sectional studies cannot infer causality, the study designs of the included studies are a limitation.66”
From Domain-Specific Physical Activity and Mental Health: A Meta-analysis (2017) · cites this paper as [66]
Citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Hu, L.-T., & Bentler, P. M. (1998) · Psychological Methods · doi:10.1037/1082-989x.3.4.424 · Cited by 12,298
Equivalence of the Mediation, Confounding and Suppression Effect
MacKinnon, D. P., Krull, J. L., & Lockwood, C. M. (2000) · Prevention Science · doi:10.1023/a:1026595011371 · Cited by 4,188
Decreased bioavailability of vitamin D in obesity
Wortsman, J., Matsuoka, L. Y., Chen, T. C., Lu, Z., & Holick, M. F. (2000) · The American Journal of Clinical Nutrition · doi:10.1093/ajcn/72.3.690 · Cited by 3,204
Unrepeatable Repeatabilities: A Common Mistake
Lessells, C. M., & Boag, P. T. (1987) · The Auk · doi:10.2307/4087240 · Cited by 2,919
PREDICTORS OF OBJECTIVE AND SUBJECTIVE CAREER SUCCESS: A META‐ANALYSIS
NG, T. W. H., EBY, L. T., SORENSEN, K. L., & FELDMAN, D. C. (2005) · Personnel Psychology · doi:10.1111/j.1744-6570.2005.00515.x · Cited by 2,412
Metadata
- Authors
- Kirk, R.
- Corresponding author
- Kirk, Roger
- Venue
- Sage eBooks
- Publisher
- SAGE Publications, Inc.
- Published
- 2013
- OpenAlex
- W2134654456
- Cited by
- 8,539
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 23 · 2025: 40 · 2024: 50 · 2023: 48 · 2022: 64 · 2021: 64 · 2020: 78 · 2019: 65 · 2018: 94 · 2017: 98 · 2016: 105 · 2015: 83 · 2014: 107 · 2013: 127
- FWCI
- 44.24
- Type
- book
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Sage eBooks (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Management Science and Operations Research › Optimal Experimental Design Methods
- Physical Sciences › Mathematics › Statistics and Probability › Statistical Methods and Bayesian Inference
- Physical Sciences › Mathematics › Statistics and Probability › Statistical Methods and Applications
- Keywords
- experimental design, behavioral science, nuisance parameters, analysis of variance, completely randomized design, multiple comparison tests, trend analysis, general linear model, randomized block design, factorial design, hierarchical design, split-plot design, covariance analysis, Latin square design, fractional factorial design
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review