CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 46Critical Race Theory in EducationRace, History, and American SocietySocial Movements and Cultural Identity

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Waiting for the Call: The Moral Activist Role of Critical Race Theory Scholarship

Ladson-Billings, Gloria, Donnor, Jamel K.·2008·Handbook of Critical and Indigenous Methodologies
DOI 10.4135/9781483385686.n4
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.4135/9781483385686.n4

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Ladson-Billings, G., & Donnor, J. K.
ORCID
Venue
Handbook of Critical and Indigenous Methodologies
Publisher
SAGE Publications, Inc.
Published
2008
Pages
61-84
DOI
10.4135/9781483385686.n4
OpenAlex
W2482945621
Cited by
46
References
0
Citations by year
2025: 1 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 3 · 2018: 2 · 2017: 2 · 2016: 3 · 2015: 1 · 2014: 7 · 2013: 4 · 2012: 2
FWCI
12.01
Type
book chapter
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Sage eBooks (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Critical Race Theory in Education
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Race, History, and American Society
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Social Movements and Cultural Identity
Keywords
critical race theory, moral activism, academic scholarship, social justice, academic activism

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review