The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
The Sociology of Childhood
Open accessAbstract
Unless otherwise indicated, in this report, the words "teenagers" and "teens" refer to women aged 15-19.The report also includes numbers, and in some cases rates, shown separately for teens younger than 15, 15-17-year-olds and 18-19-year-olds. Key findingsState levels in 2008 (Tables 1.1-1.3,1.6)*• In 2008, New Mexico had the highest teenage pregnancy rate (93 pregnancies per 1,000 women aged 15-19); the next highest rates were in Mississippi, Texas, Nevada, Arkansas and Arizona.The lowest rates were in New Hampshire (33 per 1,000), Vermont, Minnesota, North Dakota and Massachusetts.* These observations exclude the District of Columbia, which is more comparable to a city than a state.• In 2008 and 2010, teenage birthrates were highest in Mississippi (55 per 1,000 in 2010), New Mexico, Arkansas and Texas.The states with the lowest teenage birthrates were New Hampshire (16 per 1,000 in 2010), Massachusetts, Vermont, Connecticut and New Jersey.• Teenage abortion rates in 2008 were highest in New York (37 abortions per 1,000 women aged 15-19), Delaware, New Jersey, Hawaii and Connecticut.By contrast, teenage abortion rates of seven or less were found in South Dakota (5 per 1,000), Utah, Nebraska and Kentucky.• More than half of teenage pregnancies (excluding miscarriages) ended in abortion in New Jersey, New York and Connecticut.• Fourteen percent or fewer teenage pregnancies ended in abortion in six states: Kentucky, South Dakota, Arkansas, Oklahoma, Utah and West Virginia.• In general, states with the largest numbers of teenagers also had the greatest numbers of teenage pregnancies in 2008.California recorded the highest number of pregnancies among women aged 15-19 (98,530), followed by Texas, New York, Florida and Illinois (with 31,000-76,000 each).The smallest numbers of teenage pregnancies were in Vermont, North Dakota, Wyoming, South Dakota and New Hampshire, all of which reported fewer than 1,600 pregnancies among teens.• While 18-19-year-olds comprised roughly 40% of all 15-19-year-old women in most states in 2008, their pregnancies accounted for 64-76% of all teen pregnancies.Trends (Table 1.3) Between 1988 and 2000, and again between 2000 and 2005, teenage pregnancy rates declined in every state.However, between 2005 and 2008, the rate decreased 5% or more in 7 states, while increasing by 5% or more in 16 states.These changes may indicate year-to-year fluctuations, rather than trends (see Discussion, below).• New Jersey experienced the largest decrease in the teen pregnancy rate between 2005 and 2008, dropping from 71 to 62 pregnancies per 1,000 women aged 15-19, a 13% decline.Rates in Nevada and Arizona dropped 9% and 8%, respectively, between 2005 and 2008.During the same period, Louisiana experienced the largest increase in the teen pregnancy rate of any state, its rate rising 19%, from 67 to 80 per 1,000.However, Louisiana's rate in 2005 was unusually low, probably because of disruptions caused by Hurricane Katrina.Utah and Pennsylvania also experienced rate increases of more than 10% (12% and 11%, respectively).• In 2005-2008, birthrates among teenagers aged 15-19 decreased most in Arizona (7%) and Florida (5%).Twenty-one states' teen birthrates increased 5% or more, with increases of at least 12% in Vermont, Louisiana, Utah, Montana and Wyoming.• Between 2005 and 2008, abortion rates among teens decreased 5% or more in 25 states, and five states experienced declines of 15% or more: New Jersey, Nevada, Vermont, Wisconsin and Wyoming.Abortion rates among teens increased 5% or more in only eight states, and the
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
The Presentation of Self in Everyday Life.
Naegele, K. D., & Goffman, E. (1956) · American Sociological Review · doi:10.2307/2089106 · Cited by 25,991
The Child in America: Behavior Problems and Programs
Blanchard, P., Thomas, W. I., & Thomas, D. S. (1929) · Journal of the American Institute of Criminal Law and Criminology · doi:10.2307/1134792 · Cited by 1,478
Ariès, P. (1960) · Cited by 1,298
Cited by
Research with Children: The Same or Different from Research with Adults?
PUNCH, S. (2002) · Childhood · doi:10.1177/0907568202009003005 · Cited by 1,288
Working with Ethical Symmetry in Social Research with Children
CHRISTENSEN, P., & PROUT, A. (2002) · Childhood · doi:10.1177/0907568202009004007 · Cited by 893
(2009) · OAPEN (The OAPEN Foundation) · Cited by 632
“Is it fun?” developing children centred research methods
Barker, J., & Weller, S. (2003) · International Journal of Sociology and Social Policy · doi:10.1108/01443330310790435 · Cited by 475
Childhood Adultification in Economically Disadvantaged Families: A Conceptual Model
Burton, L. (2007) · Family Relations · doi:10.1111/j.1741-3729.2007.00463.x · Cited by 438
Metadata
- Authors
- Corsaro, W. A.
- Venue
- Sage eBooks
- Publisher
- SAGE Publications, Inc.
- Published
- 2015
- OpenAlex
- W2124805521
- Cited by
- 1,454
- References
- 3
- FWCI
- 97.06
- Type
- book
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: The Sociology of Childhood. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.4135/9781483399027
- The paper
- Corsaro, W. A. (2015). The Sociology of Childhood. Sage eBooks. https://doi.org/10.4135/9781483399027
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.