Social Network Analysis
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
During times of transition such as going to university, networks that are both relatively lower in density and larger in size might be more protective.
“However, during times of transition such as going to university, networks that are both relatively lower in density and larger in size might be more protective, so an individual losing access to one portion of their social network (such as moving away from family life and friends from home) would not disable their ability to access social resources from other network clusters (Scott, 2017).”
From Differences in anxieties and social networks in a group-matched sample of autistic and typically developing students transitioning to university (2020) · cites this paper as Scott, 2017
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Construction and demolition waste research: A bibliometric analysis
Wu, H., Zuo, J., Zillante, G., Wang, J., & Yuan, H. (2019) · Architectural Science Review · doi:10.1080/00038628.2018.1564646 · Cited by 115 · see citing works
Darius, P. (2022) · Social Network Analysis and Mining · doi:10.1007/s13278-022-00958-w · Cited by 22 · see citing works
Lei, J., Ashwin, C., Brosnan, M., & Russell, A. (2020) · Autism · doi:10.1177/1362361319894830 · Cited by 18 · see citing works
Lei, J., Ashwin, C., Brosnan, M., & Russell, A. (2019) · Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders · doi:10.1007/s10803-019-04070-5 · Cited by 18 · see citing works
- Authors
- Scott, J.
- Corresponding author
- Scott, John
- ORCID
- Scott, John
- Venue
- SAGE Publications Ltd eBooks
- Publisher
- SAGE Publications Ltd
- Published
- 2017
- OpenAlex
- W4301030907
- Cited by
- 879
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 49 · 2025: 60 · 2024: 65 · 2023: 68 · 2022: 76 · 2021: 78 · 2020: 85 · 2019: 147 · 2018: 123 · 2017: 34 · 2016: 8 · 2015: 7 · 2014: 8 · 2013: 6 · 2012: 7
- FWCI
- 53.29
- Type
- book
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- SAGE Publications Ltd eBooks (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Statistical and Nonlinear Physics › Complex Network Analysis Techniques
- Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Social Capital and Networks
- Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Statistics, Probability and Uncertainty › scientometrics and bibliometrics research
- Keywords
- social network analysis
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
