Cited by 18Autism Spectrum Disorder ResearchDisability Education and EmploymentFamily and Disability Support Research

Developing an Online Tool to Measure Social Network Structure and Perceived Social Support Amongst Autistic Students in Higher Education: A Feasibility Study

Open access
Lei, Jiedi, Ashwin, Chris, Brosnan, Mark, Russell, Ailsa·2019·Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders

Abstract

The academic, daily-living, and social challenges all students face during university transition can become magnified for many autistic students, who might struggle to adapt to changes in their social network structure (SNS) and perceived social support (PSS). This study assessed the development, feasibility, and convergent validity of a novel online tool (Social Network and Perceived Social Support-SNaPSS) designed to quantitatively and qualitatively evaluate SNS and PSS during university transition. SNaPSS demonstrated good feasibility for completion amongst autistic students (Study 1, n = 10, 17-19 years), and adequate convergent validity against other PSS, autism symptom severity, and social anxiety measures amongst autistic (n = 28) and typically developing students (Study 2, n = 112, 17-19 years). Broader implications of SNaPSS to measure SNS/PSS are discussed.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/s10803-019-04070-5

Cites

66 of 66 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

3 of the 69 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. Donne J The works of John Donne (H. Alford, Ed.) 1839 London John W. Parker

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Lei, J., Ashwin, C., Brosnan, M., & Russell, A.
Affiliations
University of Bath (GB)
Corresponding author
Lei, Jiedi
Venue
Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders
Published
2019-05-22
Volume
49
Issue
9
Pages
3526-3542
ISSN
  • 0162-3257 (ISSN-L)
  • 1573-3432
OpenAlex
W2946307147
Cited by
18
References
69
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 3 · 2019: 1
FWCI
1.31
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • Office for Fair Access (PhD studentship)
  • Widening Participation, University of Bath (PhD studentship)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Autism Spectrum Disorder Research
  • Social Sciences › Safety Research › Disability Education and Employment
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Family and Disability Support Research
Keywords
students with autism, social network structure, perceived social support, transition to college, convergent validity, social anxiety, autism severity, higher education
MeSH terms
Attitude, Autistic Disorder, Feasibility Studies, Female, Humans, Male, Social Support, Software, Students, Universities, Social Networking

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review