The DOI matches its Crossref record.
The Handbook of Rural Studies
Abstract
Demonstrating how the political economy and the 'cultural turn' have led to significant new thinking in the cultural representations of rurality and related fields, this title explains the key moments in which the theorization of culture nature, politics and space in rural contexts have provided ideas for wider discussion
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Towards an agroecology of knowledges: Recognition, cognitive justice and farmers’ autonomy in France
Coolsaet, B. (2016) · Journal of Rural Studies · doi:10.1016/j.jrurstud.2016.07.012 · Cited by 133
Activating the Countryside: Rural Power, the Power of the Rural and the Making of Rural Politics
Bell, M. M., Lloyd, S. E., & Vatovec, C. (2010) · Sociologia Ruralis · doi:10.1111/j.1467-9523.2010.00512.x · Cited by 97
Relationships and responses: Policing anti-social behaviour in rural Scotland
Wooff, A. (2015) · Journal of Rural Studies · doi:10.1016/j.jrurstud.2014.11.003 · Cited by 49
Jiří, P., Ondřej, K., Jiří, H., & Michal, L. (2022) · Land Use Policy · doi:10.1016/j.landusepol.2022.106046 · Cited by 11
Metadata
- Authors
- Cloke, P., Marsden, T., & Mooney, P.
- Venue
- SAGE Publications Ltd eBooks
- Publisher
- SAGE Publications Ltd
- Published
- 2006
- OpenAlex
- W114113412
- Cited by
- 835
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 50.65
- Type
- book
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
