The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Quality in Qualitative Research
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“Integrity of data interpretation will be maintained by following strategies of credibility (member check, peer debriefing) and auditability [26,27].”
From Implementation of an internet-based acceptance and commitment therapy for promoting mental health among migrant live-in caregivers in canada: Protocol (2021) · cites this paper as [26]
Citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Evaluative Criteria for Qualitative Research in Health Care: Controversies and Recommendations
Cohen, D. J., & Crabtree, B. F. (2008) · The Annals of Family Medicine · doi:10.1370/afm.818 · Cited by 913
Standards of Evidence in Qualitative Research: An Incitement to Discourse
Freeman, M. L., deMarrais, K., Preissle, J., Roulston, K., & Pierre, E. A. S. (2007) · Educational Researcher · doi:10.3102/0013189x06298009 · Cited by 489
Systematic review of the qualitative literature on return to work after injury
MacEachen, E., Clarke, J., Franche, R., Irvin, E., & Workplace-based Return to Work Literature Review Group (2006) · Scandinavian Journal of Work Environment & Health · doi:10.5271/sjweh.1009 · Cited by 372
Ajjawi, R., & Higgs, J. (2015) · The Qualitative Report · doi:10.46743/2160-3715/2007.1616 · Cited by 396
USING ASYNCHRONOUS AUDIO FEEDBACK TO ENHANCE TEACHING PRESENCE AND STUDENTS’ SENSE OF COMMUNITY
Ice, P., Curtis, R., Phillips, P. D., & Wells, J. (2007) · Online Learning · doi:10.24059/olj.v11i2.1724 · Cited by 353
Metadata
- Authors
- Seale, C.
- Corresponding author
- Seale, Clive
- Venue
- Qualitative Research Practice
- Publisher
- SAGE Publications Ltd
- Published
- 2004
- Pages
- 379-389
- OpenAlex
- W4232288648
- Cited by
- 120
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2025: 1 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 6 · 2021: 7 · 2020: 3 · 2019: 11 · 2018: 14 · 2017: 5 · 2016: 2 · 2015: 9 · 2014: 11 · 2013: 6 · 2012: 9
- FWCI
- 12.50
- Type
- book chapter
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- SAGE Publications Ltd eBooks (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Education › Qualitative Research Methods and Applications
- Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Qualitative Research Methods and Ethics
- Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Data Analysis and Archiving
- Keywords
- qualitative research, research quality, qualitative research methodology
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
