The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Evidence-based Policy
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“Traditional systematic reviews, which are often focused on randomized controlled trials, usually do not allow one to uncover causal pathways or to identify contextual mechanisms that may explain whether, why, and how interventions might work [11].”
From A realist review of mobile phone-based health interventions for non-communicable disease management in sub-Saharan Africa (2017) · cites this paper as [11]
In the citing paper
“Following guidelines for realist reviews [11, 12, 26, 27], it was necessary to make decisions about whether a study’s findings were relevant for the development of the framework and whether inferences drawn by an original study were sufficiently supported by evidence.”
From A realist review of mobile phone-based health interventions for non-communicable disease management in sub-Saharan Africa (2017) · cites this paper as [11]
Citations
Cites
Still being checked.
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Items 1,001–1,002 of 1,002
Henry, I. P. (2022) · European Sport Management Quarterly · doi:10.1080/16184742.2022.2046122 · Cited by 10
Bardon, C., Guillemette, A., Rioux, M.-E., & Rivard, M. (2023) · Disability and Rehabilitation · doi:10.1080/09638288.2022.2104943 · Cited by 8
Metadata
- Authors
- Pawson, R.
- Corresponding author
- Pawson, Ray
- ORCID
- Pawson, Ray
- Venue
- SAGE Publications Ltd eBooks
- Publisher
- SAGE Publications Ltd
- Published
- 2006
- OpenAlex
- W2478759695
- Cited by
- 1,791
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 66 · 2025: 86 · 2024: 100 · 2023: 76 · 2022: 119 · 2021: 123 · 2020: 191 · 2019: 115 · 2018: 113 · 2017: 105 · 2016: 102 · 2015: 99 · 2014: 84 · 2013: 81 · 2012: 89
- FWCI
- 18.08
- Type
- book
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- SAGE Publications Ltd eBooks (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Public Administration › Evaluation and Performance Assessment
- Social Sciences › Public Administration › Public Policy and Administration Research
- Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Health Policy Implementation Science
- Keywords
- evidence-based policy, policy making, evidence use in policymaking
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
