Cited by 8Cancer survivorship and careMedical Practices and RehabilitationMental Health and Patient Involvement

Group intervention programs and their impact on well-being and quality-of-life for adults living with a rare or orphan disease – realist review of literature

Bardon, Cécile, Guillemette, Anne, Rioux, Marie-Eve, Rivard, Mélina·2023·Disability and Rehabilitation

Abstract

PURPOSE: Adults living with a rare or orphan diseases (ROD) experience common psychosocial difficulties that are often poorly addressed in usual care. This realist literature review aims to inform the development, evaluation and implementation of evidence based group therapy programs adapted to shared needs of patients living with various ROD. METHOD: The review is based on an analysis of Context-Mechanism-Outcome configurations. It included 21 primary studies published between 2010 and April 2022 and used a PRISMA process for study selection and inclusion. RESULTS: Our results show that group psychosocial interventions can help reduce perception of symptoms and psychological impacts of disease, improve social functioning and support and quality of life in patients. CONCLUSION: Group therapy programs seem promising for ROD-patients and should be considered within comprehensive treatment and support plans. However, more comprehensive studies of group therapies in context should aim to identify core active components of these interventions with ROD-patients. Implications for Rehabilitation:Rare or Orphan Diseases are varied, difficult to diagnose and have a major impact on all aspects of the patients' lives (physical, emotional, psychological, social, professional).Psychosocial support is a key but underdeveloped component to support the recovery trajectory for these patients.In this review of group interventions, we identified a few promising practices adaptable to patients living with Rare or Orphan Diseases (Acceptance and commitment therapy, cognitive behavioural therapies, psychoeducational programs).Patients who received psychosocial group interventions are likely to experience improvement in their quality of life.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1080/09638288.2022.2104943

Cites

67 of 67 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Bardon, C., Guillemette, A., Rioux, M.-E., & Rivard, M.
Affiliations
  • Université du Québec à Montréal (CA)
  • Psychologie, Université du Québec à Montréal, Montréal, Canada
Corresponding author
Bardon, Cécile
Venue
Disability and Rehabilitation
Published
2022-08-18
Volume
45
Issue
16
Pages
2567-2577
ISSN
  • 0963-8288 (ISSN-L)
  • 1464-5165
OpenAlex
W4292407481
Cited by
8
References
67
Citations by year
2026: 4 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 2
FWCI
0.12
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Disability and Rehabilitation (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
Fondation du grand défi Pierre Lavoie
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Oncology › Cancer survivorship and care
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › Physical Therapy, Sports Therapy and Rehabilitation › Medical Practices and Rehabilitation
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Mental Health and Patient Involvement
Keywords
rare diseases, group therapy, psychosocial interventions, quality of life, well-being, social functioning, psychosocial support, acceptance and commitment therapy, cognitive behavioral therapy, psychoeducation, adults with chronic illness
MeSH terms
Adult, Behavior Therapy, Humans, Quality of Life, Cognitive Behavioral Therapy, Rare Diseases, Acceptance and Commitment Therapy

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review