Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 60

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 64 of the 64 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Molecular Differences and Similarities between Alzheimer's Disease and the 5XFAD Transgenic Mouse Model of Amyloidosis

Maarouf, Chera L., Kokjohn, Tyler A., Whiteside, Charisse M., Macias, MiMi P., Kalback, Walter M., Sabbagh, Marwan N., Beach, Thomas G., Vassar, Robert, Roher, Alex E.·2013·Biochemistry Insights

Abstract

Transgenic (Tg) mouse models of Alzheimer's disease (AD) have been extensively used to study the pathophysiology of this dementia and to test the efficacy of drugs to treat AD. The 5XFAD Tg mouse, which contains two presenilin-1 and three amyloid precursor protein (APP) mutations, was designed to rapidly recapitulate a portion of the pathologic alterations present in human AD. APP and its proteolytic peptides, as well as apolipoprotein E and endogenous mouse tau, were investigated in the 5XFAD mice at 3 months, 6 months, and 9 months. AD and nondemented subjects were used as a frame of reference. APP, amyloid-beta (Aβ) peptides, APP C-terminal fragments (CT99, CT83, AICD), β-site APP-cleaving enzyme, and APLP1 substantially increased with age in the brains of 5XFAD mice. Endogenous mouse tau did not show age-related differences. The rapid synthesis of Aβ and its impact on neuronal loss and neuroinflammation make the 5XFAD mice a desirable paradigm to model AD.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.4137/bci.s13025

Cites

64 of 64 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 64 references

Research works printed but not linked: 3

  1. Kandalepas P.C., 2013, Acta Neuropathol.
  2. Bórquez D.A., 2012, Int J Alzheimers Dis., 2012, 353145
  3. 10.1002/1531-8249(199903)45:3<358::AID-ANA12>3.0.CO;2-X · doi:10.1002/1531-8249(199903)45:3<358::aid-ana12>3.0.co;2-x

Cited by

Metadata

Authors
Maarouf, C. L., Kokjohn, T. A., Whiteside, C. M., Macias, M. P., Kalback, W. M., Sabbagh, M. N., Beach, T. G., Vassar, R., & Roher, A. E.
Affiliations
  • The Longtine Center for Neurodegenerative Biochemistry, Banner Sun Health Research Institute Sun City, AZ, USA.
  • Roberts Clinical Center, Banner Sun Health Research Institute Sun City, AZ, USA.
  • Harold Civin Laboratory for Neuropathology, Banner Sun Health Research Institute, Sun City, AZ, USA.
  • Department of Cell and Molecular Biology, Feinberg School of Medicine, Northwestern University, Chicago, IL, USA.
Venue
Biochemistry Insights
Published
2013-01
Volume
6
Pages
BCI.S13025
ISSN
1178-6264
Cited by
60
References
64
Language
en
Licence
journals.sagepub.com/page/policies/text-and-data-mining-license (tdm)

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.