Cited by 48Genomics and Phylogenetic StudiesFractal and DNA sequence analysisAlgorithms and Data Compression

Evaluating the Accuracy and Efficiency of Multiple Sequence Alignment Methods

Open access
Pervez, Muhammad Tariq, Babar, Masroor Ellahi, Nadeem, Asif, Aslam, Muhammad, Awan, Ali Raza, Aslam, Naeem, Hussain, Tanveer, Naveed, Nasir +3 more·2014·Evolutionary Bioinformatics

Abstract

A comparison of 10 most popular Multiple Sequence Alignment (MSA) tools, namely, MUSCLE, MAFFT(L-INS-i), MAFFT (FFT-NS-2), T-Coffee, ProbCons, SATe, Clustal Omega, Kalign, Multalin, and Dialign-TX is presented. We also focused on the significance of some implementations embedded in algorithm of each tool. Based on 10 simulated trees of different number of taxa generated by R, 400 known alignments and sequence files were constructed using indel-Seq-Gen. A total of 4000 test alignments were generated to study the effect of sequence length, indel size, deletion rate, and insertion rate. Results showed that alignment quality was highly dependent on the number of deletions and insertions in the sequences and that the sequence length and indel size had a weaker effect. Overall, ProbCons was consistently on the top of list of the evaluated MSA tools. SATe, being little less accurate, was 529.10% faster than ProbCons and 236.72% faster than MAFFT(L-INS-i). Among other tools, Kalign and MUSCLE achieved the highest sum of pairs. We also considered BALiBASE benchmark datasets and the results relative to BAliBASE- and indel-Seq-Gen-generated alignments were consistent in the most cases.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.4137/ebo.s19199

Cites

40 of 40 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Pervez, M. T., Babar, M. E., Nadeem, A., Aslam, M., Awan, A. R., Aslam, N., Hussain, T., Naveed, N., Qadri, S., Waheed, U., & Shoaib, M.
Affiliations
  • Virtual University of Pakistan (PK)
  • University of Veterinary and Animal Sciences (PK)
  • University of Engineering and Technology Lahore (PK)
  • NFC Institute of Engineering and Technology (PK)
  • University of Koblenz and Landau (DE)
  • Islamia University of Bahawalpur (PK)
Corresponding author
Pervez, Muhammad Tariq
Venue
Evolutionary Bioinformatics
Published
2014-01
Volume
10
Pages
205-17
ISSN
1176-9343 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2044364290
Cited by
48
References
40
Citations by year
2025: 5 · 2024: 6 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 7 · 2021: 6 · 2020: 7 · 2019: 3 · 2018: 3 · 2017: 2 · 2016: 3 · 2015: 2
FWCI
0.96
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Evolutionary Bioinformatics (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
Funders
University of Veterinary and Animal Sciences
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Genomics and Phylogenetic Studies
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Fractal and DNA sequence analysis
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Algorithms and Data Compression
Keywords
multiple sequence alignment, alignment accuracy, alignment speed, muscle, MAFFT, T-Coffee, sate, Clustal Omega, insertion rate, sequence length

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review