Cited by 62Animal Behavior and Welfare StudiesVeterinary Pharmacology and AnesthesiaAnimal health and immunology

Comparison of hot-iron and freeze branding on cortisol levels and pain sensitivity in beef cattle

Open access
Schwartzkopf-Genswein, K. S., Stookey, J. M., Passillé, A. M. de, Rushen, J.·1997·Canadian Journal of Animal Science

Abstract

Thirty yearling (450–500 kg) heifers of mixed breeds (Hereford, Charolais, Angus and Shorthorn) were habituated to handling over a 14 ± 2 d period before branding and were fitted non-surgically with jugular catheters 1 before branding. On the day of branding, heifers were assigned to hot-iron brand (H), freeze brand (F), or control (C) treatments according to a predetermined randomized branding order (n = 10 per treatment). Blood samples were obtained at 20 and 0 min before and 20, 40, 60, 80, 100, 120, 140, 160 and 180 min after application of branding treatments. To detect stress-induced analgesia, each animal's sensitivity to pain was assessed by measuring the time it took them to respond to a thermal energy source (laser) applied to their hind legs. Foot-lift latencies were obtained 0, 10, 20, 60 and 120 min after the treatments were imposed. Sensitivity to touch also was assessed 1 and 7 d after branding by placing pressure on the brand site and measuring the amount of movement by the animals. Both H and F heifers had higher mean plasma cortisol concentrations than C animals 20 and 40 min after branding (P < 0.05). However, hot branding was found to cause a more pronounced cortisol response than freeze branding at 40 min (P < 0.05). No treatment differences in foot-lift latencies or sensitivity to touch were observed. Both branding methods cause discomfort in cattle; however, hot branding appears to cause a greater acute response than freeze branding. Key words: Branding, cattle, cortisol, stress-induced analgesia

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.4141/a96-127

Cites

16 of 16 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • In calves, cortisol can return to normal levels within 80 min after a stressful event that increases cortisol by 300%.

    “For example, in calves, cortisol can return to normal levels within 80 min after a stressful event that increases cortisol by 300% (38).”

    From Effect of source and journey on physiological variables in calves transported by road and ferry between Ireland and the Netherlands (2023) · cites this paper as [38]

    The Cortisol results report a marked rise after branding and no treatment differences beyond 40 minutes; blood was also sampled at 80 minutes. But the paper studied yearling heifers, not calves, and the cited passages do not establish either a 300% increase or a return to normal specifically within 80 minutes. (LLM, conf=0.86)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 2

  1. Rodgers, R. J. and Randel, J. I. 1988. Environmentally induced analgesia: situational factors, mechanisms and significance. Pages 107-142 in R. J. Rodgers and S. J. Coopers, eds. Endorphins, opi- ates and behavioral processes. John Wiley, New York, NY.
  2. Wall, P. D. 1992. Defining "pain in animals". Pages 63-79 in C. E. Short and A. van Poznak, eds. Animal pain. Churchill Livingstone, New York, NY.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Schwartzkopf-Genswein, K. S., Stookey, J. M., Passillé, A. M. D., & Rushen, J.
Affiliations
  • University of Saskatchewan (CA)
  • Agriculture and Agri-Food Canada (CA)
Venue
Canadian Journal of Animal Science
Published
1997-09-01
Volume
77
Issue
3
Pages
369-374
ISSN
  • 0008-3984 (ISSN-L)
  • 1918-1825
OpenAlex
W2086472487
Cited by
62
References
15
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 4 · 2019: 3 · 2018: 5 · 2017: 2 · 2016: 2 · 2015: 1 · 2014: 4 · 2013: 2 · 2012: 3
FWCI
2.26
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
Canadian Journal of Animal Science (publishedVersion)
Funders
Ministry of Agriculture - Saskatchewan
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Veterinary › Small Animals › Animal Behavior and Welfare Studies
  • Health Sciences › Veterinary › Small Animals › Veterinary Pharmacology and Anesthesia
  • Health Sciences › Veterinary › Small Animals › Animal health and immunology
Keywords
freeze branding, beef cattle, heifers, plasma cortisol, stress-induced analgesia, pain sensitivity, thermal pain threshold, tactile sensitivity, animal welfare, handling stress

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review