The DOI matches its Crossref record; 25 of the 25 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Enzyme applications for monogastric feeds: A review
Abstract
The potential for industrial enzyme products as animal feed additives has attracted substantial interest from feed manufacturers as a novel means of improving animal performance. Enzyme manufacturers have also targeted feed as an alternate outlet for their products, which have primarily been in the food, beverage, and detergent industries. Despite a history dating back 35 years or more, only recently has enzyme application been extensive and efforts in research intensified. The use of enzymes that degrade polysaccharides of the endosperm cell wall has become most prominent. The major cell wall polysaccharides are the β-glucans in barley and oats and arabinoxylans (pentosans) in rye, wheat, and triticale. In barley and rye particularly, the cell wall carbohydrates are prone to solubilization. The major enzymes are endolytic and achieve their beneficial effects by removal of diffusion constraints that interfere with nutrient absorption. Although most nutrients are affected, fat malabsorption may be severe in chicks fed unsupplemented diets containing barley or rye. Young chicks give the greatest response to enzyme-induced viscosity reduction; the response is much less evident in older birds or in swine. In addition to carbohydrases, renewed research in dietary phytase has occurred with the realization that phytases provide a cost-effective alternative to inorganic phosphorous in regions with dense populations and intensive livestock production, where excessive phosphorus in animal wastes is a national concern. Other enzymes may also be beneficial, including supplementary α-amylase (in young animals) and oligosaccharidases for feeds high in oligosaccharides; however, this has not been shown conclusively. Enzymes with desired activity and stability characteristics for feed applications will continue to be developed. Future directions for enzyme research may also involve genetic manipulation of the substrate to facilitate more complete enzyme degradation, as in the case of the fiber components of rye. Key words: Dietary enzymes, β-glucanase, pentosanase, phytase, feed, β-glucan, pentosan, phytate
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Improvement of phosphorus availability by microbial phytase in broilers and pigs
Simons, P. C. M., Versteegh, H. A. J., Jongbloed, A. W., Kemme, P. A., Slump, P., Bos, K. D., Wolters, M. G. E., Beudeker, R. F., & Verschoor, G. J. (1990) · British Journal of Nutrition · doi:10.1079/bjn19900052 · Cited by 787
Hypocholesterolemic effects of oat-bran or bean intake for hypercholesterolemic men
Anderson, J., Story, L., Sieling, B., Chen, W., Petro, M., & Story, J. (1984) · The American Journal of Clinical Nutrition · doi:10.1093/ajcn/40.6.1146 · Cited by 529
The structure and interactions of starch with food constituents
Biliaderis, C. G. (1991) · Canadian Journal of Physiology and Pharmacology · doi:10.1139/y91-011 · Cited by 437
Bedford, M. R., & Classen, H. L. (1992) · The Journal of Nutrition · doi:10.1093/jn/122.3.560 · Cited by 425
Self-citationAnnison, G., & Choct, M. (1991) · World's Poultry Science Journal · doi:10.1079/wps19910019 · Cited by 279
Enzyme supplementation of a poultry diet containing rye and wheat
Pettersson, D., & Åman, P. (1989) · British Journal of Nutrition · doi:10.1079/bjn19890014 · Cited by 275
BEDFORD, M. R., CLASSEN, H. L., & CAMPBELL, G. L. (1991) · Poultry Science · doi:10.3382/ps.0701571 · Cited by 221
Self-citationCOON, C. N., LESKE, K. L., AKAVANICHAN, O., & CHENG, T. K. (1990) · Poultry Science · doi:10.3382/ps.0690787 · Cited by 216
Henry, R. J. (1987) · Journal of Cereal Science · doi:10.1016/s0733-5210(87)80062-0 · Cited by 203
A comparison of the non‐starch carbohydrates in cereal grains
Henry, R. J. (1985) · Journal of the Science of Food and Agriculture · doi:10.1002/jsfa.2740361207 · Cited by 168
Cited by
Butt, M. S., Tahir-Nadeem, M., Khan, M. K. I., Shabir, R., & Butt, M. S. (2008) · European Journal of Nutrition · doi:10.1007/s00394-008-0698-7 · Cited by 559
Non-starch polysaccharides in the diets of young weaned piglets.
Pluske, J. R., Kim, J. C., McDonald, D. E., Pethick, D. W., & Hampson, D. J. (2001) · The weaner pig: nutrition and management. Proceedings of a British Society of Animal Science Occasional Meeting, University of Nottingham, UK, September 2000 · doi:10.1079/9780851995328.0081 · Cited by 44
Metadata
- Authors
- Campbell, G. L., & Bedford, M. R.
- Venue
- Canadian Journal of Animal Science
- Publisher
- Canadian Science Publishing
- Published
- 1992-09-01
- Volume
- 72
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 449-466
- ISSN
- 0008-3984 (ISSN-L)
- 1918-1825
- OpenAlex
- W2108140061
- Cited by
- 286
- References
- 25
- FWCI
- 13.92
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Enzyme applications for monogastric feeds: A review. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.4141/cjas92-058
- The paper
- Campbell, G. L., & Bedford, M. R. (1992). Enzyme applications for monogastric feeds: A review. Canadian Journal of Animal Science. https://doi.org/10.4141/cjas92-058
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.