Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 286

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 25 of the 25 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Enzyme applications for monogastric feeds: A review

Campbell, G. L., Bedford, M. R.·1992·Canadian Journal of Animal Science

Abstract

The potential for industrial enzyme products as animal feed additives has attracted substantial interest from feed manufacturers as a novel means of improving animal performance. Enzyme manufacturers have also targeted feed as an alternate outlet for their products, which have primarily been in the food, beverage, and detergent industries. Despite a history dating back 35 years or more, only recently has enzyme application been extensive and efforts in research intensified. The use of enzymes that degrade polysaccharides of the endosperm cell wall has become most prominent. The major cell wall polysaccharides are the β-glucans in barley and oats and arabinoxylans (pentosans) in rye, wheat, and triticale. In barley and rye particularly, the cell wall carbohydrates are prone to solubilization. The major enzymes are endolytic and achieve their beneficial effects by removal of diffusion constraints that interfere with nutrient absorption. Although most nutrients are affected, fat malabsorption may be severe in chicks fed unsupplemented diets containing barley or rye. Young chicks give the greatest response to enzyme-induced viscosity reduction; the response is much less evident in older birds or in swine. In addition to carbohydrases, renewed research in dietary phytase has occurred with the realization that phytases provide a cost-effective alternative to inorganic phosphorous in regions with dense populations and intensive livestock production, where excessive phosphorus in animal wastes is a national concern. Other enzymes may also be beneficial, including supplementary α-amylase (in young animals) and oligosaccharidases for feeds high in oligosaccharides; however, this has not been shown conclusively. Enzymes with desired activity and stability characteristics for feed applications will continue to be developed. Future directions for enzyme research may also involve genetic manipulation of the substrate to facilitate more complete enzyme degradation, as in the case of the fiber components of rye. Key words: Dietary enzymes, β-glucanase, pentosanase, phytase, feed, β-glucan, pentosan, phytate

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.4141/cjas92-058

Cites

25 of 25 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 25 references

Cited by

See all 286

Metadata

Authors
Campbell, G. L., & Bedford, M. R.
Venue
Canadian Journal of Animal Science
Published
1992-09-01
Volume
72
Issue
3
Pages
449-466
ISSN
  • 0008-3984 (ISSN-L)
  • 1918-1825
OpenAlex
W2108140061
Cited by
286
References
25
FWCI
13.92
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Enzyme applications for monogastric feeds: A review. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.4141/cjas92-058
The paper
Campbell, G. L., & Bedford, M. R. (1992). Enzyme applications for monogastric feeds: A review. Canadian Journal of Animal Science. https://doi.org/10.4141/cjas92-058

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.