Cited by 20Agricultural Science and FertilizationSoil Management and Crop YieldSoil Carbon and Nitrogen Dynamics

Livestock manure improves acid soil productivity under a cold northern Alberta climate

Open access
Benke, M.B., Hao, X., O’Donovan, J.T., Clayton, G.W., Lupwayi, N.Z., Caffyn, P., Hall, M.·2010·Canadian Journal of Soil Science

Abstract

The acid-ameliorating properties of feedlot cattle manure on barley and canola productivity in acid soils were evaluated from 2003 to 2007 at Fort Vermilion and Beaverlodge research stations in northern Alberta, Canada. Treatments included Control, NP fertilizer, Lime + NP fertilizer and manure at 80 (M80) and 160 (M160) Mg ha-1. Manure and lime were applied once in 2003 and NP fertilizer was applied annually. Manure significantly increased soil pH from around 4 to >5 and this increase persisted over the 4-yr period. At Fort Vermilion, M160 reduced soil 0.01 M CaCl 2 extractable Al and Mn contents from 2.9 and 11.7 mg kg-1 (Control) to 1.1 and 8.9 mg kg-1 and barley straw Mn content from 313 (Control) to 220 mg kg-1. Soil P (Mehlich 3) and K (0.01 M CaCl 2 extractable) contents in M160 were more than two times those in the Control, while values from fertilizer treatments were not different from the Control. Crop grain N, P and K uptakes and yields in M160 were twice those of the Control. In northern Alberta, manure application to acid soils at a rate of 160 Mg ha-1 once every 4 yr had the same effectiveness as Lime + NP fertilizer in increasing soil pH and improving soil fertility and crop productivity at the field scale.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.4141/cjss09112

Cites

44 of 44 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • 160 Mg ha-1 (wet wt.) of cattle feedlot manure added to acidic Gray Luvisols (pH 4.1 to 4.8) in northern Alberta led to a similar increase in soil pH as the addition of 5 Mg ha-1 of lime (97% calcium carbonate).

    “Benke et al. (2010) found that 160 Mg ha (1 (wet wt.) of cattle feedlot manure added to acidic Gray Luvisols (pH 4.1 to 4.8) in northern Alberta led to a similar increase in soil pH as the addition of 5 Mg ha (1 of lime (97% calcium carbonate).”

    From The role of organic amendments in soil reclamation: A review (2012) · cites this paper as Benke et al. 2010

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 3

  1. [6]6. Caffyn, P., Hao, X., Chang, C., Hall, M., Clayton, G. and O'Donovan, J. 2004. Amending Peace River acid soil with cattle manure. Alberta Soil Science Workshop, Feb. 17Á19, Lethbridge, AB. Canola Council of Canada. 2009. Acidity, salinization, solo- netzic in Canola growers manual. [Online] Available: http:// www.canola-council.org/chapter6.aspx [2009 Apr. Canola Council of Canada, Winnipeg, MB.
  2. [39]39. Sumner, M. E. and Noble, A. D. 2003. Soil acidification: The world history. Pages 1Á28 in Z. Rengel, ed. Handbook of soil acidity. Marcel Dekker, New York, NY.
  3. [46]46. Ziadi, N. and Sen Tran, T. 2008a. Lime requirement. Pages 129Á134 in M. R. Carter and E. G. Gregorich, eds. Soil sampling and methods of analysis. 2nd ed. CRC Press, Boca Raton, FL.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Benke, M. B., Hao, X., O’Donovan, J. T., Clayton, G. W., Lupwayi, N. Z., Caffyn, P., & Hall, M.
Affiliations
Agriculture and Agri-Food Canada (CA)
Corresponding author
Hao, X.
Venue
Canadian Journal of Soil Science
Published
2010-12-01
Volume
90
Issue
4
Pages
685-697
ISSN
  • 0008-4271 (ISSN-L)
  • 1918-1841
OpenAlex
W1773873258
Cited by
20
References
44
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 2 · 2020: 3 · 2019: 4 · 2018: 2 · 2016: 1 · 2014: 2 · 2012: 1
FWCI
0.53
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
Canadian Journal of Soil Science (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Soil Science › Agricultural Science and Fertilization
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Soil Science › Soil Management and Crop Yield
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Soil Science › Soil Carbon and Nitrogen Dynamics
Keywords
livestock manure, acid soils, soil acidification, soil pH, liming, barley, canola, extractable aluminum, extractable manganese, soil phosphorus, soil potassium, crop nutrient uptake, crop yield, northern Alberta, cold climate

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review