The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
A review of the effects of forage condensed tannins on ruminal fermentation and bloat in grazing cattle
Open accessAbstract
Condensed tannins (CT) are polyphenolic secondary plant products that are widespread in the plant kingdom. By definition, CT bind to protein and are regarded as "antinutritional" compounds which reduce protein digestibility. Variations in CT chemistry alter protein binding capacities among polymers from different plant species and developmental stages. Condensed tannins interact with proteins in feed, saliva and microbial cells, with microbial exoenzymes, and with endogenous proteins or other feed components, which alters digestive processes as compared with diets free of CT. Tannin levels exceeding 40 to 50 g kg−1 DM in forages may reduce protein and DM digestibility of the forages by ruminants. At low to moderate levels, CT increase the quantity of dietary protein, especially essential amino acids, flowing to the small intestine. Unlike alfalfa, legumes that contain CT do not cause bloat. Dietary CT may provide a means to beneficially manipulate protein digestion and/or prevent pasture bloat in ruminants. Research efforts are also currently being directed to genetically modify alfalfa to de-repress its CT biosynthetic pathway, or to move genes encoding steps of this pathway into alfalfa from other legumes. The effects of CT in forage legumes on digestion in ruminants and the potential use of tannin-rich forages for preventing bloat in grazing systems are discussed. Key words: Tannins, bloat, by-pass protein, cattle, grazing, alfalfa
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Antimicrobial properties of tannins
Scalbert, A. (1991) · Phytochemistry · doi:10.1016/0031-9422(91)83426-l · Cited by 2,321
Cited by
Unravelling the conundrum of tannins in animal nutrition and health
Mueller‐Harvey, I. (2006) · Journal of the Science of Food and Agriculture · doi:10.1002/jsfa.2577 · Cited by 965
Hristov, A. N., Oh, J., Firkins, J. L., Dijkstra, J., Kebreab, E., Waghorn, G., Makkar, H. P. S., Adesogan, A. T., Yang, W., Lee, C., et al. (2013) · Journal of Animal Science · doi:10.2527/jas.2013-6583 · Cited by 958
Consequences of plant phenolic compounds for productivity and health of ruminants
Waghorn, G. C., & McNabb, W. C. (2003) · Proceedings of the Nutrition Society · doi:10.1079/pns2003245 · Cited by 313
Legume Natural Products: Understanding and Manipulating Complex Pathways for Human and Animal Health
Dixon, R. A., & Sumner, L. W. (2003) · Plant Physiology · doi:10.1104/pp.102.017319 · Cited by 293
The use of grain legumes as a protein source in pig nutrition: A review
Jezierny, D., Mosenthin, R., & Bauer, E. (2010) · Animal Feed Science and Technology · doi:10.1016/j.anifeedsci.2010.03.001 · Cited by 288
Metadata
- Authors
- McMahon, L. R., McAllister, T. A., Berg, B. P., Majak, W., Acharya, S. N., Popp, J. D., Coulman, B. E., Wang, Y., & Cheng, K.-J.
- Venue
- Canadian Journal of Plant Science
- Publisher
- Canadian Science Publishing
- Published
- 2000-07-01
- Volume
- 80
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 469-485
- ISSN
- 0008-4220 (ISSN-L)
- 1918-1833
- OpenAlex
- W2104114696
- Cited by
- 292
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 12.07
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: A review of the effects of forage condensed tannins on ruminal fermentation and bloat in grazing cattle. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.4141/p99-050
- The paper
- McMahon, L. R., McAllister, T. A., Berg, B. P., Majak, W., Acharya, S. N., Popp, J. D., Coulman, B. E., Wang, Y., & Cheng, K.-J. (2000). A review of the effects of forage condensed tannins on ruminal fermentation and bloat in grazing cattle. Canadian Journal of Plant Science. https://doi.org/10.4141/p99-050
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.