The DOI matches its Crossref record; 15 of the 15 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
SPECIAL TOPICS — Mitigation of methane and nitrous oxide emissions from animal operations: I. A review of enteric methane mitigation options1
Open accessAbstract
The goal of this review was to analyze published data related to mitigation of enteric methane (CH4) emissions from ruminant animals to document the most effective and sustainable strategies. Increasing forage digestibility and digestible forage intake was one of the major recommended CH4 mitigation practices. Although responses vary, CH4 emissions can be reduced when corn silage replaces grass silage in the diet. Feeding legume silages could also lower CH4 emissions compared to grass silage due to their lower fiber concentration. Dietary lipids can be effective in reducing CH4 emissions, but their applicability will depend on effects on feed intake, fiber digestibility, production, and milk composition. Inclusion of concentrate feeds in the diet of ruminants will likely decrease CH4 emission intensity (Ei; CH4 per unit animal product), particularly when inclusion is above 40% of dietary dry matter and rumen function is not impaired. Supplementation of diets containing medium to poor quality forages with small amounts of concentrate feed will typically decrease CH4 Ei. Nitrates show promise as CH4 mitigation agents, but more studies are needed to fully understand their impact on whole-farm greenhouse gas emissions, animal productivity, and animal health. Through their effect on feed efficiency and rumen stoichiometry, ionophores are likely to have a moderate CH4 mitigating effect in ruminants fed high-grain or mixed grain-forage diets. Tannins may also reduce CH4 emissions although in some situations intake and milk production may be compromised. Some direct-fed microbials, such as yeast-based products, might have a moderate CH4-mitigating effect through increasing animal productivity and feed efficiency, but the effect is likely to be inconsistent. Vaccines against rumen archaea may offer mitigation opportunities in the future although the extent of CH4 reduction is likely to be small and adaptation by ruminal microbes and persistence of the effect is unknown. Overall, improving forage quality and the overall efficiency of dietary nutrient use is an effective way of decreasing CH4 Ei. Several feed supplements have a potential to reduce CH4 emission from ruminants although their long-term effect has not been well established and some are toxic or may not be economically feasible.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Johnson, K. A., & Johnson, D. E. (1995) · Journal of Animal Science · doi:10.2527/1995.7382483x · Cited by 2,714
Invited review: essential oils as modifiers of rumen microbial fermentation
Calsamiglia, S., Busquet, M., Cardozo, P. W., Castillejos, L., & Ferret, A. (2007) · Journal of Dairy Science · doi:10.3168/jds.2006-644 · Cited by 1,014
Microbial ecosystem and methanogenesis in ruminants
Morgavi, D. P., Forano, E., Martin, C., & Newbold, C. J. (2010) · animal · doi:10.1017/s1751731110000546 · Cited by 694
Desnoyers, M., Giger-Reverdin, S., Bertin, G., Duvaux-Ponter, C., & Sauvant, D. (2009) · Journal of Dairy Science · doi:10.3168/jds.2008-1414 · Cited by 420
Methylotrophic methanogenic Thermoplasmata implicated in reduced methane emissions from bovine rumen
Poulsen, M., Schwab, C., Borg Jensen, B., Engberg, R. M., Spang, A., Canibe, N., Højberg, O., Milinovich, G., Fragner, L., Schleper, C., et al. (2013) · Nature Communications · doi:10.1038/ncomms2432 · Cited by 361
Methane mitigation from ruminants using tannins and saponins
Goel, G., & Makkar, H. P. S. (2012) · Tropical Animal Health and Production · doi:10.1007/s11250-011-9966-2 · Cited by 336
Self-citationNatural products as manipulators of rumen fermentation
Wallace, R. J., McEwan, N. R., McIntosh, F. M., Teferedegne, B., & Newbold, C. J. (2002) · Asian-Australasian Journal of Animal Sciences · doi:10.5713/ajas.2002.1458 · Cited by 324
Grainger, C., Clarke, T., Auldist, M. J., Beauchemin, K. A., McGinn, S. M., Waghorn, G. C., & Eckard, R. J. (2009) · Canadian Journal of Animal Science · doi:10.4141/cjas08110 · Cited by 293
Self-citationAssociation of methanogenic bacteria with rumen ciliates
Vogels, G. D., Hoppe, W. F., & Stumm, C. K. (1980) · Applied and Environmental Microbiology · doi:10.1128/aem.40.3.608-612.1980 · Cited by 284
Aspects of rumen microbiology central to mechanistic modelling of methane production in cattle
ELLIS, J. L., DIJKSTRA, J., KEBREAB, E., BANNINK, A., ODONGO, N. E., McBRIDE, B. W., & FRANCE, J. (2008) · The Journal of Agricultural Science · doi:10.1017/s0021859608007752 · Cited by 274
Cited by
The role of ciliate protozoa in the rumen
Newbold, C. J., de la Fuente, G., Belanche, A., Ramos-Morales, E., & McEwan, N. R. (2015) · Frontiers in Microbiology · doi:10.3389/fmicb.2015.01313 · Cited by 637
The rumen microbiome: balancing food security and environmental impacts
Mizrahi, I., Wallace, R. J., & Moraïs, S. (2021) · Nature Reviews Microbiology · doi:10.1038/s41579-021-00543-6 · Cited by 490
Rumen methanogens and mitigation of methane emission by anti-methanogenic compounds and substances
Patra, A., Park, T., Kim, M., & Yu, Z. (2017) · Journal of Animal Science and Biotechnology · doi:10.1186/s40104-017-0145-9 · Cited by 466
Roque, B. M., Venegas, M., Kinley, R. D., de Nys, R., Duarte, T. L., Yang, X., & Kebreab, E. (2021) · PLOS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0247820 · Cited by 433
Self-citationHost genetics and the rumen microbiome jointly associate with methane emissions in dairy cows
Difford, G. F., Plichta, D. R., Løvendahl, P., Lassen, J., Noel, S. J., Højberg, O., Wright, A.-D. G., Zhu, Z., Kristensen, L., Nielsen, H. B., et al. (2018) · PLOS Genetics · doi:10.1371/journal.pgen.1007580 · Cited by 382
Metadata
- Authors
- Hristov, A. N., Oh, J., Firkins, J. L., Dijkstra, J., Kebreab, E., Waghorn, G., Makkar, H. P. S., Adesogan, A. T., Yang, W., Lee, C., Gerber, P. J., Henderson, B., & Tricarico, J. M.
- Venue
- Journal of Animal Science
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 2013-11-01
- Volume
- 91
- Issue
- 11
- Pages
- 5045-5069
- ISSN
- 0021-8812 (ISSN-L)
- 1525-3163
- OpenAlex
- W2015527152
- Cited by
- 958
- References
- 15
- FWCI
- 113.91
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: SPECIAL TOPICS — Mitigation of methane and nitrous oxide emissions from animal operations: I. A review of enteric methane mitigation options1. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.2527/jas.2013-6583
- The paper
- Hristov, A. N., Oh, J., Firkins, J. L., Dijkstra, J., Kebreab, E., Waghorn, G., Makkar, H. P. S., Adesogan, A. T., Yang, W., Lee, C., Gerber, P. J., Henderson, B., & Tricarico, J. M. (2013). SPECIAL TOPICS — Mitigation of methane and nitrous oxide emissions from animal operations: I. A review of enteric methane mitigation options1. Journal of Animal Science. https://doi.org/10.2527/jas.2013-6583
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.