Cited by 60Ruminant Nutrition and Digestive PhysiologyWastewater Treatment and ReuseLivestock Farming and Management

Nutrient cycling in the vegetable processing industry: Utilization of potato by-products

Open access
Charmley, E., Nelson, D., Zvomuya, F.·2006·Canadian Journal of Soil Science

Abstract

Potato (Solanum tuberosum) production in Canada and the United States totals approximately 30 × 106 Mg yr-1. Approximately half of this is unsuitable for human consumption. This potato by-product comprises cull potatoes and potato processing waste (PPW). Liquid waste from processing plants can be applied to agricultural land. With strict environmental monitoring and control, crops such as corn (Zea mays L.), vegetables and grass can be used to divert large volumes of liquid waste. Solid waste and culls have traditionally been put in landfills or disposed of on agricultural land as a fertilizer. However these can be diverted from landfill sites or agricultural land and used as a high-quality animal feed, principally in beef feedlots. Research has shown that PPW can replace corn and barley (Hordeum vulgare L.) grain without negative effects on growth of beef cattle or meat quality. Indeed, efficiency of animal growth per unit diet intake is improved. These effects have been observed with diets containing up to 80% PPW. Results to date suggest that PPW is a valuable livestock feed ingredient and has no deleterious effects on beef quality. In areas where PPW is available, feeding to beef cattle represents a viable alternative to other disposal options. Key words: Potato, processing waste, by-product, cattle, land disposal

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.4141/s05-118

Cites

22 of 22 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 6

  1. Charmley, E. 1998 . Comparative study on the effects of production system on the quality of AA-graded beef in the Maritimes. In Proc. Design strategies to produce desirable beef carcasses with consistent meat quality. 2000 May 04-06. Agriculture and AgriFood Canada, Lacombe, AB.
  2. Charmley, E., Snowdon, M., Firth, S. and Murphy, S. 2000 . Exploring future feed resources. In Proc. National Beef Science Seminar: New science for a new century. 2000 Jan. 26-28. Agriculture and Agri-Food Canada, Lethbridge, AB.
  3. Lewis, M. 1999. Potatoes in silage mixtures. Potato Rev., May 1999. pp. 32-33.
  4. National Research Council. 1996 . Nutrient requirements of beef cattle. 7th ed. National Academy Press, Washington, DC.
  5. Smith, J. H., Robbins, C. W., Bondurant, J. A. and Hayden, C. W. 1976. Treatment of potato processing wastewater on agricultural lands: water and organic loading, and the fate of applied plant nutrients. Pages 769-781 in Proc. Cornell Agricultural Waste Management Conference, Cornell University, Ithaca, NY.
  6. US Environmental Protection Agency. 2004 . Technical development document for the final effluent limitations guidelines and standards for the meat and poultry products point source category. Vol. 1. 40CFR 432. EPA-821-R-04-011. US Environmental Protection Agency, Office of Water Engineering and Analysis Division, Washington, DC.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Charmley, E., Nelson, D., & Zvomuya, F.
Affiliations
  • Commonwealth Scientific and Industrial Research Organisation (AU)
  • Agriculture and Agri-Food Canada (CA)
Venue
Canadian Journal of Soil Science
Published
2006-08-01
Volume
86
Issue
4
Pages
621-629
ISSN
  • 0008-4271 (ISSN-L)
  • 1918-1841
OpenAlex
W2098611422
Cited by
60
References
22
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 6 · 2020: 8 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 1 · 2017: 5 · 2016: 5 · 2015: 5 · 2014: 4 · 2013: 1 · 2012: 2
FWCI
0.67
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
Canadian Journal of Soil Science (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Agronomy and Crop Science › Ruminant Nutrition and Digestive Physiology
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Waste Management and Disposal › Wastewater Treatment and Reuse
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Agronomy and Crop Science › Livestock Farming and Management
Keywords
potato processing waste, potato by-products, nutrient cycling, beef cattle feed, animal feed, beef quality, land disposal, landfill diversion

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review