The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Comparing the osteogenic potential of canine mesenchymal stem cells derived from adipose tissues, bone marrow, umbilical cord blood, and Wharton's jelly for treating bone defects
Open accessAbstract
Alternative sources of mesenchymal stem cells (MSCs) for replacing bone marrow (BM) have been extensively investigated in the field of bone tissue engineering. The purpose of this study was to compare the osteogenic potential of canine MSCs derived from adipose tissue (AT), BM, umbilical cord blood (UCB), and Wharton's jelly (WJ) using in vitro culture techniques and in vivo orthotopic implantation assays. After canine MSCs were isolated from various tissues, the proliferation and osteogenic potential along with vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) production were measured and compared in vitro. For the in vivo assay, MSCs derived from each type of tissue were mixed with β-tricalcium phosphate and implanted into segmental bone defects in dogs. Among the different types of MSCs, AT-MSCs had a higher proliferation potential and BM-MSCs produced the most VEGF. AT-MSCs and UCB-MSCs showed greater in vitro osteogenic potential compared to the other cells. Radiographic and histological analyses showed that all tested MSCs had similar osteogenic capacities, and the level of new bone formation was much higher with implants containing MSCs than cell-free implants. These results indicate that AT-MSCs, UCB-MSCs, and WJ-MSCs can potentially be used in place of BM-MSCs for clinical bone engineering procedures.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Kern, S., Eichler, H., Stoeve, J., Klüter, H., & Bieback, K. (2006) · STEM CELLS · doi:10.1634/stemcells.2005-0342 · Cited by 3,370
Tissue-engineered bone regeneration
Petite, H., Viateau, V., Bensaïd, W., Meunier, A., de Pollak, C., Bourguignon, M., Oudina, K., Sedel, L., & Guillemin, G. (2000) · Nature Biotechnology · doi:10.1038/79449 · Cited by 1,475
Cited by
Mattar, P., & Bieback, K. (2015) · Frontiers in Immunology · doi:10.3389/fimmu.2015.00560 · Cited by 300
Hurdles to uptake of mesenchymal stem cells and their progenitors in therapeutic products
Childs, P. G., Reid, S., Salmeron-Sanchez, M., & Dalby, M. J. (2020) · Biochemical Journal · doi:10.1042/bcj20190382 · Cited by 27
Metadata
- Authors
- Kang, B.-J., Ryu, H.-H., Park, S. S., Koyama, Y., Kikuchi, M., Woo, H.-M., Kim, W. H., & Kweon, O.-K.
- Venue
- Journal of Veterinary Science
- Published
- 2012
- Volume
- 13
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 299
- ISSN
- 1229-845X (ISSN-L)
- 1976-555X
- OpenAlex
- W2068484915
- Cited by
- 173
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 5.14
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- gold
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.