Cited by 4Lung Cancer Diagnosis and TreatmentLung Cancer Treatments and MutationsLung Cancer Research Studies

Efficacy of combination chemotherapy with paclitaxel and cisplatin in patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer

Open access
Rhee, Eun Jung, Jeong, Hyun Sik, Lee, Seung Sei·2002·Cancer Research and Treatment

Abstract

PURPOSE: To evaluate the efficacy and toxicity of the combination therapy of paclitaxel and cisplatin in advanced, non-small cell, lung cancer patients. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Between December 1997 and September 2001, 37 patients with advanced, non-small cell, lung cancer were enrolled in this study. Patients were treated with paclitaxel (135 mg/m2, 24 hr infusion) and cisplatin (75 mg/m2). The treatments were repeated every 4 weeks. RESULTS: Among the 37 patients enrolled, 21 were treated with paclitaxel and cisplatin as a first-line and 16 patients as a second-line. The median age of the patients was 59. In the first-line group, 10 had stage IIIB and 11 had stage IV, non small cell lung cancer. Of 21 patients in first-line treatment group that could be evaluated, objective responses were observed in 6 patients (response rate: 28.6%, CR: 4.8%, PR: 23.8%). The mediansurvival duration for patients was 48 weeks. With the second-line group, 3 patients showed a partial response (response rate: 18.7%) to treatment, with median survival duration of 44 weeks. Grade 3-4 leukopenia was observed in 27.1% of the first-line, and 23.6% in second- line, treatment groups. CONCLUSION: Combination chemotherapy, with paclitaxel and cisplatin, in non-small cell lung cancer has acceptable toxicities in both first and second-line treatment groups. In terms of efficacy, no superior response was shown for either group. More randomized studies, with a larger group of patients, are required to prove the true efficacy.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.4143/crt.2002.34.1.28

Cites

10 of 10 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Sequential PTX followed by a platinum-based regimen is currently first-line therapy for ovarian cancer and a common treatment for breast cancer.

    “The combination chemotherapy using sequential administration of paclitaxel (PTX) followed by a platinum-based regimen is currently the first-line therapy for ovarian cancer as well as common treatment for breast cancer [1, 2].”

    From Co-delivery of Paclitaxel and Cisplatin in Poly(2-oxazoline) Polymeric Micelles: Implications for Drug Loading, Release, Pharmacokinetics and Outcome of Ovarian and Breast Cancer Treatments (2019) · cites this paper as [2]

    The treatment-methods passage (결론 section; page unavailable) describes paclitaxel given before cisplatin, but the patients had advanced non-small-cell lung cancer. The discussion in the same section says paclitaxel is effective against ovarian and breast cancers; it does not say the sequential combination is first-line therapy for ovarian cancer or a common breast-cancer treatment. (LLM, conf=0.85)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 5

  1. Ginsberg RJ, Vokes EE, Raben A. Cancer of the lung. In: DeVita VT Jr, Hellman S, Rosenberg SA, eds. Cancer: Prin- ciples and practice of oncology, 6th edit, Philadelphia: Lippincott-Raven, 2001:925-1017.
  2. Webb A, O'Brien M. Where to go with new expensive treat- ment in NSCLC. Br J Cancer 1998;78(2):159-162.
  3. Crino L, Clerici M, Figoli F. Chemotherapy of advanced non- small cell lung cancer: a comparison of three active regimens. Ann Oncol 1995;6:347-353.
  4. Ginsberg RJ, Vokes EE, Raben A. Principles of cancer man- agement: Chemotherapy. In: DeVita VT Jr, Hellman S, Ro- senberg SA, eds. Cancer: Principles and practice of oncology, 6th edit, Philadelphia: Lippincott-Raven, 2001:437-445.
  5. Bonomi P, Kim K, Fairclough D, et al. Comparison of survival and quality of life in advanced non-small cell lung cancer patients treated with two dose levels of paclitaxel combined with cisplatin versus etoposide with cisplatin: results of and Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group trial. J Clin Oncol 2000; 18(3):623-631.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Rhee, E. J., Jeong, H. S., & Lee, S. S.
Affiliations
Kangbuk Samsung Hospital (KR)
Venue
Cancer Research and Treatment
Published
2002-02-28
Volume
34
Issue
1
Pages
28-33
ISSN
  • 1598-2998 (ISSN-L)
  • 2005-9256
OpenAlex
W2282516002
Cited by
4
References
10
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2018: 1
FWCI
0.55
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Cancer Research and Treatment (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine › Lung Cancer Diagnosis and Treatment
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine › Lung Cancer Treatments and Mutations
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Oncology › Lung Cancer Research Studies
Keywords
paclitaxel, cisplatin, combination chemotherapy, non-small cell lung cancer, advanced lung cancer, first-line therapy, second-line therapy, objective response rate, survival, leukopenia, chemotherapy toxicity

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review