Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 326

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Improved protocols for Aspergillus minimal medium: trace element and minimal medium salt stock solutions

Open access
Hill, Terry W, Kafer, Etta·2001·Fungal Genetics Reports

Abstract

Simplified protocols for ingredients of Aspergillus minimal medium (MM) are presented. These either do not change the final composition of MM or at most involve only minor modifications which, in extensive comparative tests, have not shown any effects on growth patterns of all strains/cultures tested.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.4148/1941-4765.1173

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cited by

See all 326

Metadata

Authors
Hill, T. W., & Kafer, E.
Venue
Fungal Genetics Reports
Published
2001-09-01
Volume
48
Issue
1
Pages
20-21
ISSN
  • 1941-4757 (ISSN-L)
  • 1941-4765
OpenAlex
W2593716255
Cited by
326
References
0
FWCI
0.54
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
hybrid

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Improved protocols for Aspergillus minimal medium: trace element and minimal medium salt stock solutions. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.4148/1941-4765.1173
The paper
Hill, T. W., & Kafer, E. (2001). Improved protocols for Aspergillus minimal medium: trace element and minimal medium salt stock solutions. Fungal Genetics Reports. https://doi.org/10.4148/1941-4765.1173

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.