Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 1,033

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

LINEAR AND NONLINEAR MIXED-EFFECTS MODELS

Open access
Bates, Douglas M., Pinheiro, Jose C.·1998·Conference on Applied Statistics in Agriculture

Abstract

Recent developments in computational methods for maximum likelihood (ML) or restricted maximum likelihood (REML) estimation of parameters in general linear mixed-effects models have made the analysis of data in typical agricultural settings much easier. With software such as SAS PROC MIXED we are able to handle data from random-effects one-way classifications, from blocked designs including incomplete blocked designs, from hierarchical designs such as splitplot designs, and other types of data that may be described as repeated measures or longitudinal data or growth-curve data. It is especially helpful that the new computational methods do not depend on balance in the data so we are able to deal more easily with observational studies or with randomly missing data in a designed experiment . We describe some of the new computational approaches and how they are implemented in the nlme3.0 library for the S-PLUS language. One of the most powerful features of this language is the graphics capabilities, especially the trellis graphics facilities developed by Bill Cleveland and his coworkers at Bell Labs. Although most participants in this conference may be more familiar with SAS, and most of the models described here can be fit with PROC MIXED or the NLiNMIX macro or new PROC NLM IXED in SAS version 7, some exposure to the combination of graphical display and model-fitting approaches from S-PLUS may be informative . We show how data exploration with trellis graphics, followed by fitting and comparing mixedeffects models, followed by graphical assessment of the fitted model can be used in a variety of situations. On some occasions, such as modeling growth curves, a linear trend or polynomial trend or other types of linear statistical models for the within-subject time dependence are just not going to do an adequate job of representing the data. In those cases, a nonlinear model is more appropriate. We show how the concept of a random coefficient model can be extended to nonlinear models so as to fit nonlinear mixed-effects models .

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.4148/2475-7772.1273

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 1 references

Cited by

See all 1,033

Metadata

Authors
Bates, D. M., & Pinheiro, J. C.
Venue
Conference on Applied Statistics in Agriculture
Published
1998-04-26
ISSN
2475-7772 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2153999622
Cited by
1,033
References
1
FWCI
0.00
Type
conference paper
Language
en
Open access
hybrid

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: LINEAR AND NONLINEAR MIXED-EFFECTS MODELS. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.4148/2475-7772.1273
The paper
Bates, D. M., & Pinheiro, J. C. (1998). LINEAR AND NONLINEAR MIXED-EFFECTS MODELS. Conference on Applied Statistics in Agriculture. https://doi.org/10.4148/2475-7772.1273

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.